xyz
posted 09/22/09 10:57 AM | updated 09/22/09 10:57 AM
Featured Post! | Views: 60 | Comments : 3 | Politics

Mallahan Victim of Vulcan Mind-Meld?

By Michael van Baker
Editor
Recommend this story (0 votes)

You haven't read much here about Joe Mallahan, Seattle's other mayoral candidate, and that's because Mallahan has seemingly adopted a "loose lips sink ships" policy to this point. While Mallahan never misses a chance to tout his "progressive values," his demeanor is archetypically conservative. He projects himself as an authority, and bridles at being asked to go into detail. If he says he'll do it, he'll do it.

But the Seattle Times reports that Mallahan is now searching for ways to fund the $191 million dollar Mercer Street redevelopment, after coming out strongly against the project in the primary. The Times quotes Mallahan as saying earlier that the project was "stealing" from Seattle's neighborhoods.

The new Mallahan says things like: "I think the Mercer Street project is a very good neighborhood development project and it will do great things for South Lake Union. If it were properly financed, I would be in favor of it."

Vulcan, South Lake Union's 800-lb. gorilla, would very much like Mallahan to reconsider his opposition, and suggested as much by paying for anti-Mallahan phone calls during the primary.

Today, the Times also says, Mallahan will announce his Coalition of the Willing, a team of a dozen or so advisers, including the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce's Tayloe Washburn. Washburn has no love but Mallahan in the mayoral race, given Mike McGinn's opposition to the deep-bore tunnel, which Washburn believes is the answer to Seattle's Viaduct conundrum.

The shift in his Mercer stance makes Mallahan the fiscal conservative who is advocating spending a $191 million on Mercer and $4.2 billion on a deep-bore tunnel (with Seattle responsible for cost overruns)--and is critical of "the cost of building light rail to the rest of the city's high-density neighborhoods."

You can't say the mayoral race doesn't offer you a choice.

Save and Share this article
Tags: joe mallahan, mercer, deep-bore tunnel, tayloe washburn, viaduct
savecancel
CommentsRSS Feed
Chamber and Vulcan = Establishment
Now that the Chamber and Vulcan are running Mallahan's campaign, does anyone still think he can call himself a "threat to the establishment?"
Comment by Stacy
4 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
I can say it
Not really clear what the choice is yet. We've got two unformed (and potentially uninformed) candidates. Still trying to understand what McGinn is for - at least what is practically achievable.

From his website, his #1 issue (not the tunnel boys, sorry), is a mayoral takeover of the schools. Shades of Bloomberg. And his expertise here is exactly what? And his right to do this what?

His #2 issue is improving internet bandwidth. Clearly the number 2 issue in the city. Again, how does the mayor achieve this kind of goal? Is he planning on taking over the private companies that deliver internet now?

Number 3 - improve transit by adding bus service and removing redundant bus stops. That's the ticket.

Over-development, crappy development, quality of life, police concerns don't even show up on his Issues page. Oh, and he's going to 'honor' neighborhoods.

Does anyone read this stuff, or are you all too tunnel-obsessed?

Not saying Mallahan is great, but McGinn is just as much a joke.
Comment by bilco
4 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: I can say it
bilco, you've hit upon my primary concern with McGinn, which is that his campaign is weirdly unfocused. I'm not implying that compared to Mallahan, McGinn is the right-thinking person's choice. But while we have to choose between two inexperienced candidates for mayor, the two of them do have distinctly different styles. And their bases of support seem to be crystallizing into distinctly different camps.
Comment by Michael van Baker
4 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: