The SunBreak
posted 02/21/10 12:01 PM | updated 02/20/10 01:42 PM
Featured Post! | Views: 0 | Comments : 7 | Film & TV

Coming Soon: That Kurt Cobain Biopic. Starring Zac Efron?

By Clint Brownlee
Recommend this story (0 votes)
Share

I told you before. And I'm telling you again: If there's an actor alive today who exudes all the emotional turmoil, confounding complexity, and mystic depth that was Kurt Cobain, it is the tween magnet who did those all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world high school movies.

Can Zac Efron sing? Check. (Could Cobain? Discuss.)

Can Efron play guitar? Doesn't really matter.

Can he rock a rock tee and jeans? You decide.

Can he brood? Mask pain with a sarcastic grin?

That's the real question. Can Efron—or anyone else with or without a SAG card—convey soul-deep doubt, desperate ambition, seething anger, and instant likability with a twitch of his mouth? A glacier-cool, sidelong look at the camera?

Hollywood's creative/financial minds are now seriously noodling this question, because a long-in-the-works Cobain biopic is finally moving forward. Based partially on Charles Cross' Heavier Than Heaven, a David Benioff-penned script is now in the hands of The Messenger director Oren Moverman. (Courtney Love's producer credit has not doomed the flick to straight-to-DVD obscurity. Yay!)

This is good. Moverman's co-written Messenger screenplay has landed an Oscar nom. He also co-wrote the lauded Bob Dylan love letter I'm Not There, so he knows how to respectfully portray a revered artist on film. (Aside: I'm Not There sucked for anyone not intimately educated on Dylan's oeuvre. A similar treatment of Cobain's life and work could prove equally sucky—even for the hardiest of Nirvana fans.)

Moverman's association with Ben Foster—that dude who does crazy so well—puts the actor in obvious contention for the Cobain role. He's no talent powerhouse like Efron, but he can certainly brood.

My suggestion to Hollywood: Go with a nobody. Anyone we recognize—anyone whose abs make the girls swoon—will not be able to disappear into the role, to become Kurt Cobain.

Or, go with Joe Anderson. Compared to Brad Pitt, he's a nobody. He can sing (Across the Universe). He's the right age. And holy shit he looks just like Kurt. He's even done a movie called The 27 Club. Whoa. Cue the Twilight Zone music.

Save and Share this article
Tags: kurt cobain, kurt cobain biopic, kurt cobain movie, ben foster, joe anderson, oren moverman, nirvana, charles cross, zac efron, high school musical, heavier than heaven, david benioff
savecancel
CommentsRSS Feed
Who?
Definitely not! It would be a sacrilege to Kurt's name.
Comment by Evie
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Oh, Wow!
I think you should put more time and focus being educated about people and things before you write something as horrific like this. I know the advice, don't be a fan and all, right? You're just ignorant.
Comment by Faraaz
5 months ago
( --1 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
NO WAY
this is bullshit :( courtney FUCK YOU!!!!
Comment by boddah
5 months ago
( --1 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
DOOOOOOOOOOOON´T
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF SOMEONE DO TAHT I KILL MYSELF
Comment by Kurt Lennon
5 months ago
( --1 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Sounds fine to me...
It's not like Zac Efron is going to be doing dance routines in the middle of the play, he is a decent actor and somewhat looks like Kurt. Also, he can sing. Sure he made a bad decision by performing in the High School Muscial Trilogy, but anyone that can sing and is willing to learn to play guitar left handed kinda deserves the role. I reckon he might actually do a good job with the movie.
Comment by KommandGeek
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RnR vs Hollywood
So, Mr. Cobain was the ultimate rock and roll rebel. Okay, I'll buy that (sorta). What in the world does that have to do with the corporate America that Hollywood represents?

If you're bought in to the powerful H-wood lobby, I guess you might think this would matter. But a true RnR rebel really wouldn't give a shit. Artists exist to be artists - that's it. Corporate 'artists' exist to maximize their revenue. These are 2 different worlds.
Comment by bilco
5 months ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Valid point
Can't really argue with you, bilco. Two different worlds, yes. But it's different when the original material is fact--even if it is rock. Casting will say everything about Hollywood's approach.
Comment by Clint Brownlee
5 months ago
( +1 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: