The SunBreak
posted 02/24/10 02:47 PM | updated 02/24/10 05:57 PM
Featured Post! | Views: 0 | Comments : 2 | Politics

State College Students Owe Rep. Deb Wallace a Vote of Thanks

By Michael van Baker
Editor
Recommend this story (0 votes)

Rep. Deb Wallace

"A bill that would allow the state's largest universities to set their own tuition, within limits, appears all but dead after it failed to move out of a House committee Tuesday," reported the Times today, just after its editorial board admonished state Rep. Deb Wallace that she "shouldn't drag her legislative heels on what would be one of the most significant fiscal-policy measures to come from the Legislature in decades."

Apparently Wallace does not read the Seattle Times op-ed page, or like many, ignores the unreasoned, unsupported perspectives when they appear.

(Lately the Times has shifted from ill-defended opinion to indefensible opinion, as in today's "forget health care reform" piece in which they argue that the election of a Republican in a state that has already instituted health care reform was a vote against health care reform.)

In any event, students at Washington State University, Western Washington University and the University of Washington can breathe a little easier. The Senate bill (SB 6562) would have ceded tuition-setting control to the state universities, with the ludicrous "limits" of a maximum of a one-year fourteen-percent increase, but not more than an average of nine percent per year, over fifteen years. (It's worth noting that the legislature already granted the universities a one-time 14 percent increase last year.)

As I mentioned a little while ago, Washington state higher education rated an "F" in affordability back in 2008. Tuition at the University of Washington has risen about 327 percent over the last twenty years. College presidents like to pitch tuition increases as a "soak the rich" scheme, pointing to increased financial aid packages, but the financial aid is overwhelmingly in the form of student loans, not grants.

The people getting soaked are the middle class parents of students who go to public schools, and the students themselves. (Median household income has not tripled or doubled over the same time period, if you needed to be reminded.) Certainly what has not increased 327 percent in the last twenty years is the entry-level salary for a college graduate. In the midst of the Great Recession, recent graduates will be lucky to find a job at all.

They can save money for student loan payments, of course, by not subscribing to the Seattle Times. [UPDATE: In retrospect, that last line is too harsh. Plenty of good reporting is in the Times, and it would be a shame for people to go without because of a few hundred witless words. People might even pay extra for a subscription that came without the editorial board or Krauthamer.]

Save and Share this article
Tags: tuition, college, university, bill, sb 6562, seattle times, op-ed, university of washington, dee wallace
savecancel
CommentsRSS Feed
Apparently we shouldn't read this garbage either
Why would you give tuition setting authority to a state government that only contributes 8% of the operating budget for UW (not sure what it is for the other state universities)? Of course this is a win for the students currently at these universities, duh. But those students who spoke out against this bill passing have screwed the students that will come after them and either (a) not get accepted because enrollment is cut or (b) will get stuck in larger classes or have limited choices and no real faculty support them. But hey, they don't have to pay more.

Mr. Michael -- if you owned a company that offered online learning classes, and let's say I bought 8% of that company, would you let me set the prices customers pay to participate in those classes? Of course not. That's insanity. Debbie Wallace is your typical WA state politician -- she's never held a real job outside of government. Yet, we let people like her make business decisions. Horrible...

Sincerely, J
Comment by J
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: Apparently we shouldn't read this garbage either
I haven't seen eight percent for the UW, J, can you source that for me?

I have a Seattle Times story that quotes the WWU president as saying the state was paying 43 percent in 2009, down from 70 percent a decade ago. I agree that the numbers are ridiculous. Higher public funding should be reinstated if we're going to have things called state universities. Otherwise, let's quit pretending we have a civic interest and move straight to privatization.

However, in response to your analogy, no one's "buying into" anything. The state has long had budget control, and this bill would have removed it. The public has for decades invested in our state schools, and now is being asked to take a back seat to university leadership, who are the last people the last twenty years would demonstrate have a handle on cost control.

The larger problem here is not who gets to increase the cost of higher education. For two decades, university leadership has gone begging to the legislature for higher tuition, and gotten permission, with the result that college costs have skyrocketed faster than health care costs. This bill would have accomplished exactly nothing except the assuaging of million-dollar university president ego.
Comment by Michael van Baker
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: