The SunBreak
posted 05/21/10 01:00 PM | updated 05/21/10 11:42 AM
Featured Post! | Views: 0 | Comments : 36 | Features

Opinion: An Atheist's Defense of "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day"

By rootwinterguard
Recommend this story (2 votes)

Posted on behalf of Mike Gillis, Board member of Seattle Atheists. "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" was an idea conceived by Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris who jokingly floated the idea in reaction to South Park's debacle with portraying Mohammed in an episode of the animated series.

I support "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day." Why? Because I support free speech. Even speech I don't like. Especially speech I don't like.

Just the same way I'd support "Everybody Eat a Hamburger Day," if it were Hindus using threats of violence against people who ate beef.

In a free society, free speech means having the right to say exactly what someone doesn't want to hear. If you don't like what someone has to say, you need to answer with your own free speech. Violence and the threat of it is not free speech. It is the admission that you have a losing argument in favor of your position. Nothing justifies violence to chill free speech, not one having their religious sensibilities offended. Nothing.

If some religious person drew an offensive cartoon or wrote an offensive op-ed about atheists, it would be insane and morally reprehensible for me to kill the person who wrote or drew it. It would be wrong for me to cut off their head, shoot them eight times and stab them through the heart. It would be wrong for me to set embassies on fire and beat people up.

It would be wrong for me to chant for their deaths and call upon other atheists to kill them for being offensive. It would be wrong for me to imply a death threat to the writer or cartoonist and then post pictures of the above beheaded murder victim on my website. It would be wrong for me to break into the writer or cartoonist's house with an axe and try to kill them in front of their grandchild. Ever. No matter how much I was offended. No matter how bad the cartoons or op-ed was.

And it would be insane for anyone on the outside of this--especially liberal-minded people who claim to support the right to free speech--to be more offended by the cartoons than by my threats of violence, or the actual execution of said violence. It would be insane for well-meaning liberal folks to take the side of militant fundamentalists' violence enforcement of their blasphemy laws against people who aren't even a part of their religion. Yet, this is exactly what we've done with Islam.

We wouldn't tolerate this violence or the threats if the Catholics or Mormons or Scientologists were doing it in response to having their religion mocked in a cartoon. In fact, they all have been. Part of living in our society means that your culture will have to integrate into a few ways. We want your language, your sense of humor, your food, your clothing, your historical narrative, and your music. We want all of the things that other immigrant groups have brought to add to and enrich American culture.

But there are some basic principles we won't compromise on, freedom of speech and expression being the big one. The proper answer to speech you don't like is more speech. Not violence. Not because you're offended. I'm offended to the core by what various religious people say all the time. That doesn't give me the right to use law or violence to silence them. It burdens me with the responsibility of responding with words, not fists, blades, bullets, or threats.

You will occasionally be offended by what you hear people say here. And things you say will inevitably offend someone else. That's the price of admission. We're not allowed to kill or threaten people because we don't like what they say. Period.

We don't let Pat Robertson do it. And we won't let you.

And to my well-meaning liberal friends that seem to believe that blasphemy is a worse crime than murder, battery, arson, or inciting violence: Ask yourself if you'd feel the same way if the Pope had called upon Catholics to kill cartoonists for depicting Jesus in an offensive way.

I support "Everybody Draw Muhammad Day" not to be pointlessly provocative or to single anyone out for being mocked. In fact, I believe the very opposite. Islam, like every other religion, isn't immune to mockery or criticism. And no one should try to make themselves immune through death threats.

I'm participating because the point still needs to be made that religious sensibilities don't give someone license to use violence or the threat of it.

Save and Share this article
CommentsRSS Feed
Nice!
I agree with you, and nicely put. Muslims all over the place were saying, somewhat lamely "Well, ok, techincally you can, but you SHOULDN"T, because it's an insult to us!", and things of a less liberal vein.

Pointing out that muslims kill over it doesn't phase them. They either say "But you're insulting the moderate majority!", or "We can't be held responsible for the actions of the violent minority if you do."

I'd rather insult the entirety if Islam than to let one death threat over a cartoon go unanswered.
Comment by Bookman
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
nice mean?
WHAT SAYS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION;
IF I SAY ALL AMERICANS ARE BASTARD. I CAN SAY IT?. DESPITE OF THE FACT THAT MAJORITY OF AMERICAN AND EUROPEONS ARE REALLY FATHERLESS PEOPLES BUT I THINK NO ONE SHOULD NOT SAY IT BECAUSE OF ETHICS AND MORALITY.

HENCE YOU SHOULD ALSO LIMIT THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION TO THE EXTENT, NOT TO DISGRACE OR INSULT OTHER HUMAN BEINGS. YOU CAN COMPARE THOUGHTS AND IDEAS BUT NOT ABUSE TO PERSONALITIES AND SPECIALLY SACRED AND SELECTED BY GOD PERSONS.

IF FREEDOMS IS SO NECESSARY THEN PLEASE REMOVE THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS? SHOULD IT BE, DEFINITELY NOT BECAUSE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT SO MUCH FREEDOM, TO HURT OTHERS. HOPE THE SENSIBLE PERSONS UNDERSTAND;

AND ONLY SENSIBLE PERSONS UNDERSTAND
Comment by NISAR
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Revenge
i dnt want 2 say anything abt dat pers0n who disc0ver dat type of day but still they cant put any damage on word Islam so far away fr0m our religi0n Islam.. Dat type of steps really appreciable nd motivated for Muslims dat these type of people have a great fear of Islam.. Keep going all bastards, these all sh0ws h0w u all r narr0w minded abt Islam..
Comment by asad khan
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: Revenge
asan

go back to school to learn how to communicate

ignorant muslim fuck head

i will draw mohammed all over my fucking city with my tag

come and find me jihad muppet ..who is stringing you ?
Comment by coughlan
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: Revenge
narrow minded ?

your women are so oppressed they walk around Monte Carlo
in black masks cos you guys are so sexually insecure that no other man can see theis skin

and we are narrow minded ?

look it is quiet simple .. your countries are so politically oppressed that you are all actually socially 100 yrs or more in some cases behind modern world thought

and i want to express that OUR versin of democracy is not the answer either

PR voting and respect is what rocks my boat

REPLY ?
Comment by coughlan
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: Revenge
@coughlan, for the record, "ignorant muslim fuck head" isn't acceptable for our comments section, unless you happen to be quoting someone, as I'm doing. "Jihad muppet," on the other hand, is more than fine, as it carries an implicit critique.
Comment by Michael van Baker
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
hmmm
Haha nice offend them all because it is your right. I mean if the US and UK can somehow justify the fact they can illegally and immorally invade two Muslim countries , pretty much anything goes.
Comment by Ohyeah
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Your god is a wimp if he needs you to defend him. Can't he defend himself?
Freud once said something like, "The first person to hurl an insult instead of a rock started civilization."

Why should the west bow to the threats of a religion that cant seem to allow their own "all powerful god" take care of us face to face without the help of the fans? He must not be all powerful if he needs humans to defend him from wimpy finite humans like us.

When any believer of any religion shouts "Don't pick on my daddy" I get the image of a midget standing spread eagle in front of the Terminator shouting, "DONT HIT MY ALL POWERFUL GOD, YOU MIGHT HURT HIM". If I am a wimp compared to your god, what could I possibly do?

And what would this say about the morality of this alleged god that his top priorities aren't things like hunger, disease, crime and war......No, his top priority is making sure you die for him so he doesn't get picked on.

I wouldn't worship a monster whose more concerned about being called names than doing REAL things that humans do to try to problem solve together without violence.

I don't bow to threats and I don't worship petty tyrants who think getting picked on is the worst thing in life.
Comment by Brian37
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
And to the person who brought up the wars........
What makes you think all people in the U.K or U.S wanted this war or approve of these wars?

Maybe if the nuts in the east would stop rattling their sabers and stop blowing things up, the west wouldn't have anything to "wrongfully" react to and make excuses for.

Maybe the east needs it's own Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine. Maybe if Islam would learn to leave it at words instead of "defending honor", there would be more peace in the world.

Not every white person in the west, much less America agrees with the tactics of their governments or even that of Isreal. But we are not going to bow to threats. PERIOD. If the east wants peace, WE WANT IT TOO, but it will be mutual, not submissive. God/s should be that of the individual and not political tools, by any government.
Comment by Brian37
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
I'd rather be a bastard than a tyrant.
QUOTE:"keep going all bastards, these all sh0ws h0w u all r narr0w minded abt Islam.."

"Narrow minded" is thinking you are the only person in the world. Narrow minded is thinking your god is the only one people should follow. Narrow minded is thinking you are entitled to own the planet.

There are 6 billion people on this planet, it is way past time for OUR SPECIES to give up this tribal gang fighting and stop worrying about getting picked on, and worry about REAL problems, like hunger, disease, pollution.

Again, anyone, much less your god or anyone's god, who would harm someone over mere words is not worthy of anything but condemnation.
Comment by Brian37
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
A bastard......
A "bastard" may "offend" but doesn't always kill. A super "bastard" always kills, and the are properly called tyrants.
Comment by Brian37
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Everybody Draw Mohammed Day!"
all over now cos google have caved in


free speech ..see it here there and nowhere

fuck google for backing down

nice one to the artist tho the name salmon rushdie springs to mind

change your name ..looks and proffession cos google have betrayed you

hated microhard all their PC days never liked GOOGLE

yuppie kids with no spine or worldview ..

freedom of speech V $

GOOGLE will always choose $

am not an atheist but tolerate all views

have been violent

might be again ...

reserve the right to decide

freedom of speech is paramount ..

am anti gay but that is outlawed now

think i give a fuck ?


ex ira head looking for a cause that is me

it is all shit ...surrounded by mosques and moslems in my town

they have no fucking right to tell me i cant draw my idea of a mere prophet like MOHAMMED
Comment by coughlan
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Announcing Show Mohammed Day June 3rd: Rallys in Celebration of Freedom of Speech & Religion.
Announcing Show Mohammed Day June 3rd: Rallys in Celebration of Freedom of Speech & Religion.
I hadn't expected much to come of Everybody Draw Mohammed Day once the instigator
canceled it and there was no organized effort for rally's in support of it. Little did I know there were so many in favor of censorship
that would arise and capture the day instead. I'd planned to to announce the new event yesterday on the wall of the
Everybody Draw Mohammed day facebook page.. only to discover when I was ready that it had disappeared. I thought it would be back
today but since it isn't I need to find other ways to get the word out to suggest people being organizing real world rally's in support
of freedom of speech and religion. I was hoping you might consider helping announce and spread the word about the group.

The facebook page is at
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Show-Mohammed-Day/121228857900

and a backup of the welcome page is at
http://www.showmohammed.com/

Unfortunately with the Everybody Draws Mohammed facebook page and its > 100,000 people following it perhaps having been censored.. I seem
to be suddenly starting from scratch to find sources to spread the word.

thanks.
Comment by Celebrate Free Speech
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Well Said
Also, I think there's a double standard in play here. It's ok for muslims to disclaim Christianity as being tainted and distorted and that Jesus was not the son of god but only a prophet, challenging the very fabric of Christian beliefs yet any criticism towards Islam calls for violence? A clear sign of people acting irrational over something written 1300+ years ago during a different time and awareness of the world.
Comment by nick
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Success of May 20th
The first page received up to 100,000 supporters prior to being removed, the 2nd page was up to 14,500 supporters before it was also removed.
The 'protest' was a huge success, no one had acid splashed into their faces, no one had their hands cut off with swords, and no one was bombed by a homicide bomber.
We [atheists, Pagans, Xians, Hindus, & Buddhists] all exercised our right to freedom of expression in the face of "Hate Speech Mongers" who masquerade as a "Religion of Peace".
Comment by IdrewMohammadToo
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
where is the peace?
first of all- i think the muslims have a point- we shouldnt offend their religion and this should be the start of ending hatred towards all groups.. if muslims were create a page abt Jews or Hindus then we should also create "drama" and tell fb to delete that page and make it known all over the world.. we should start today not to hate.. i believe in freedom of speech but i mean i also believe in humanity and common sense. are we so cold hearted and dumb that we cannot control our actions? i think we need to just hold onto our egos and try to be peaceful.. thats all i have to say
Peace Out
Comment by Peacelover
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Fairness and respect
Irrespective of speech being free or suppressed, respect begets respect; and respect ensures peace and prosperity for all, especially in a multi-cultured territory like the USA. The author's atheistic confusion is the reason the world is witnessing all sorts of moral, financial, academic, scientific crises today.

While the author has raised some seemingly commendable arguments, by virtue of the same

[1] USA and her allies should not have attacked Afghanistan based on the Bin Laden video (even if authentically his) messages - just speech. Other than that to date there is not an iota of credible evidence that the Afghan deserved the shock-n-awe demonstration of violence. Where was the atheistic fairness then?

[2] Iran should not be threatened with sanctions and military invasion just because they question (speech) the existence of Israel. In light of the Israeli aggression against unarmed and subjugated Palestinians, this free-speech should be supported by the author.

[3]. Threats of lawsuits and extra-judicial operations against people who demand a thorough investigation to verify the veracity of the holocaust claims should be condemned and stopped. What's the matter? this is not free speech?

Last but not least, "Islam, like every other religion, isn't immune to mockery or criticism."

Just as you think you have a right to define your values, be it free speech or anything else, the Muslims have a right to define the sanctity, immunity, respect, honor, etc of their religion. Your input in this matter is irrelevant since you do not even know the religion beyond knowing a few of it imperfect followers.

When one tries to restrict, define, defile, revile, insult the sanctity of any people by violating their human rights (respect for their ideology included), he/she forfeits his/her rights to oppose how the offended construe the offensive words and/or actions, as well as the reaction(s) they deem appropriate.

Simple put, just because you are an atheist, it does not mean you can impose on everyone your ideas through humor, mockery or any other way. The very right you deny God by denying His existence. Muslims, on the other hand, do not impose their religion on non-Muslims. They simply demand respect for their God, the Messenger (peach be upon him), the Quran and all other relevant things. Hence, just as He is irrelevant to you, your ilk can be (is) irrelevant to those who believe in Him.

Ironically, USA is a country that has the worst record of suppressing freedom of indigenous and other inhabitants of the continent, as well as people halfway across the globe. Therefore, references to the so-called "American values" are moot and meaningless even in that country. :-P

Quran: chapter 109

1. Say: O disbelievers!

2. I worship not that which ye worship;

3. Nor worship ye that which I worship.

4. And I shall not worship that which ye worship.

5. Nor will ye worship that which I worship.

6. Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion.

Peace!
Comment by Naushad Tauheed
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
FREEDM & LAW
Dear All
If freedom of expression means to allow insult others which is a bigger crime that murder, robbery etc then there should be no law, no schools of moral thought.

The freedom of one person is limited to the LAWS AND MORALITIES OF COMMUNITY.

IF DO NOT STOP INSULTING BEHAVIOUR BY LAW THEN NO OTHER LAW WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ANY OTHER CRIME.
Comment by NISAR AHMAD
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
hmmm
well, The article says 'In a free society, free speech means having the right to say exactly what someone doesn't want to hear.'

I think thats not correct. its true in case when free speech has some solid ground. some solid arguments. some solid reasons. I can't think of any reason why Prophet Muhammad is being depicted this. drawing someone like kid is a childish thing in its own.

WHERE IS PEACE, HARMONY AND RESPECT OF OTHERS BELIEVES HAVE GONE. IS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OUTWEIGHS THEM????
Comment by MOZ
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
next thing wud be the freedom of murder!
If others are really happy and "free" about teasing their own religion and making fun of their belief ..then so be it...we don't come down there and protest..do we??? but when it comes to our belief and our religion...we have every right to protect it....
answer me one question...if the person the under attack was you family member would u still be bothering about freedom of speech? our religion means more to us than any other living object in this world...we have every right to defend it! and without knowing any depths of islam...You HAVE NO RIGHT to accuse it!!!
our religion is our property! trespassers have no rights to comment on it! i swear by Allah... you will learn the truth sooner or later...

PEACE !
Comment by FZ
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: DRAW DAY
Freedom of Speech has some limits indeed! You can not abuse a person right in middle of street! It is agaist the law! You can't claim an objection on someone's sister, mother, daughter's character! Can you? Well if any one thinks yes! I believe that he should put him in that scenerio and imagine!
Comment by Abdullah
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Re: Draw day
Freedom of speech my arse. When one attack black ppl, you cal it racism. When one attack jewish ppl, you cal it anti-semetism. Whenone attack women, you cal it sexism. When one attack homosexuality, you cal it intolerance. When one attack a country, you cal it treason. When one attack a religious sect, you cal it hate speech. But...when one attack the Prophet (PBUH), dey cal it freedom of speech..!!....Weird...Anyway thou nevertheless still they cant put any damage on word Islam. Islam is still one of the fastest growing religion in the world and most of these converts been women (i am one of them)

Walaykum salaam warahmatulaah wabarakaatuh.
Comment by Aisha Diago.
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
stop it!
freedom of speech is a good thing, but freedom of speech for the sake of insulting someone's feelings and above all insulting someone's religion is unbearable. what sort of people make fun of someone's honor, feelings and values. i am sure not the people who believe they belong to the civilized world. so stop it!

stop singling us out, stop insulting our religion and stop making us hate you and stop using this term freedom of speech because you are not using it the right way!
Comment by faraz
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Reform Islam Now
Muslims should learn to live with things that offend them. People have lived with and tolerated offensive muslim norms for ages.
Muslim Fanatics should rethink this jihad against human rights and civilized values. It will do Islam no good, now or in the future.
I support the Everybody Draw Mohammed Day. If muslims do not want to draw Mohammed, some people want to do so. And the threat of violence by Jihadists cannot stop them.
Comment by Leo
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
To all the Muslims who have replied
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. This is exactly how free speech works: Someone says something you find offensive, so you reply with statements of your own in an attempt to convince or condemn. Maybe minds are changed, maybe they aren't, but everyone gets his or her say, and that's fair.

My own comment on all of this is that I think the people who have criticized the "Atheist's Defense" have so far all missed a very crucial point: the MASSIVELY disproportionate extremes that many Muslims have responded to the cartoons with. Embassies have burned; people have died in the protests. Cartoonists have been actively targeted for assassination, while mobs across the world have chanted for their deaths. CARTOONISTS. The absurdity would be hilarious if it weren't so terrifying.

But that's the point of Draw Mohammed Day. If the Danish cartoons had been met with nonviolent protests, angry letters, maybe a boycott or two, then we wouldn't be having this discussion right now. The storm would've blown over, and the cartoonists would've ended up looking a little more like jerks for picking a fight. But the violence has given other non-Muslims a reason to stand up in solidarity and "exercise their free-speech rights" because the danger adds an element of bravery. You're right that, taken in isolation, a cartoon of Mohammed is simply an insult to those who believe Mohammed should never be drawn. But put it in this context, and it becomes a noble stand for the principle that no insult can ever justify murder.

So if you want to register your offense (a perfectly legitimate thing to do), be aware that it will ring hollow if you don't acknowledge and disavow the severe crimes being perpetrated in the name of that offense. So far I've not seen anyone do that; just the opposite. For example, in the post titled (ironically) "Fairness and respect," we find: "When one tries to restrict, define, defile, revile, insult the sanctity of any people by violating their human rights (respect for their ideology included), he/she forfeits his/her rights to oppose how the offended construe the offensive words and/or actions, as well as the reaction(s) they deem appropriate."

When the "human rights violation" is a cartoon, and "the reaction(s) they deem appropriate" are MURDEROUS ACTS OF VIOLENCE, damn skippy the potential victims and those of like mind have a right to oppose them. The stakes are very, very, very real here. If you want non-Muslims to respect your sense of offendedness, you can't ignore or slyly condone the deadly overreactions of others on your side of the debate.
Comment by a fleshy, three-dimensional ca
2 days ago
( +1 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Mike Gillis' article re cartoons of Mohammed
Mr. Gillis is right on and one of the few cartoonists who has the guts to point out that being offended doesn't justify violence. The right of free speech is something all Americans learn when they read the Constitution and Bill of Rights in school, but apparently our society needs it repeated, again and again. It can't be repeated enough as far as I'm concerned.
Comment by DR
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
The Engine of Growth
Diversity of opinion and the freedom to express it is the engine necessary for a society to adapt, change and grow. People who seek to curtail freedom of speech seek nothing less than stultifying stagnation - eternal recapitulation to a stagnant Truth(TM).
Comment by Greg Teed
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
One person's prophet is another person's fairy tale.
I once had a discussion with an elderly woman in Jerusalem regarding the Neo-Nazis who used to live in my state. She could not believe that in America, these people could say anything they wanted, as long as they didn't threaten or hurt anybody. I told her that in order for us to effectively oppose them, we had to let them speak, and demonstrate to the world just how irredeemable they really were.

Anyhow, they crossed the line by taking a shot at a passing car, which lead to prosecutions, lawsuits, and their removal from our great state. We protect speech, we do not protect violence or threats of violence.

I do not believe in the sanctity of Mohammed. If he were alive today and living in the US, he would be imprisoned for statutory rape, as well as polygamy. His only redeeming quality is that he loved cats, which doesn't even begin to compensate for his hatred of dogs. Any person who hates man's best friend is no prophet of mine.

What Muslims simply do not understand is that they have no right to tell me what is sacred and what is not. Just because Mohammed is sacred to you does not mean he is sacred to me. If he's so great and magnificent, he can take care of himself.

Another thing radical Muslims do not understand is the futility of Jihad. Any person who thinks he can overthrow Western civilization using guerrilla warfare is delusional. The West will prevail, not because we have a different culture, but because we have a better culture that is based on The Enlightenment instead of the outdated ramblings of a polygamous perverted prophet who likes little girls.
Comment by Idaho Kid
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Religion
In a free society you can express your views. It is what keeps society free. As far as religion goes, you have the legal right to beleive any mythological story you choose to. You do not have the right to act out every religious principle that is included in your holy book. You get only one wife at a time, you cannot stone people for working on the sabath or failing to be virgins, etc. Everyone else has the right to laugh at your particual religion. You can be offended, that is a choice. You do not get to kill over it. Whine all you want, but that is all you get to do.
Comment by Momma Rose
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Ok, lets all play nice because someone cant control themselves.
QUOTE:" but freedom of speech for the sake of insulting someone's feelings and above all insulting someone's religion is unbearable."

Ok, you don't like having your feelings hurt. So because of that we should make violence legal? Anytime someone hurts our feelings we should kill them?

I am sure Stalin and Hitler didn't want you hurting their feelings either. I am glad those bastards aren't able to tell me who to like or what to say.
Comment by Brian37
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Free speech?
Free speech you don't like? What if I spat something racist right now or something against homosexuals? Would you defend me too? Or would you bash me?

The important thing to note is: Free speech is okay WHEN IT DOESN'T MEAN TO HARM OR DISRESPECT.

Clearly this is meant to disrespect a certain group of people. So you atheists can go shove it.
Comment by Hypocrite
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Missing the point
I personally haven't taken part in this and I think it's wrong to attack ANY group.

And the above reason is why I support the protest.

It isn't an attack on Muslims it's a protest against the actions of threats of violence against a group of artists.

Many people see and hear things that offends them everyday, this doesn't mean that they have the right to physically threaten or attack those people.

This protest to me stands for the right and defense of those artist in not to be attacked and it shows that we as people will not give in to threats of violence.

I am saddened that so many Muslims have been offended by simple pictures but please think about the offense cased by the few extremists who threaten and kill people for drawing these simple pictures. And if you have true faith in your religion then God and God alone is the only one who has the right to deal with these people as he sees fit.

It is not for any one to take the life of another, and God alone will deal with these extremists as he sees fit.

My message to everyone on both sides of this is simple.

If you don't like what you see, close the page and look at something you do like. Everyone is different and has different values. If it offends you, then close the page, don't actively seek out things that offend you...

..Everyone has a choice, we are all free.

Peace
Comment by david
1 day ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Living versus non-living
I myself participated in this little game - I actually created a photo of myself with a turban and beard which is Muhammed-like - precisely to make the point that those living are what need protecting. The dead need no such protection. The ideas of the dead are their own protection IF they are correct ideas. If they are wrong ideas, it is right they fade away.

In any event, it's a travesty for those living to make more sacred the name and image and ideas of the dead than other persons living. Only life is sacred because only that which is living needs protection.

As a word to muslims who may be offended by my photo, I say this: to me, your life is more sacred than any inanimate object, than any name or image of anyone dead, than even the ideas of the dead. You cannot insult me save to physically harm me or those who are living I might care for.

You may not harm the living ... and you cannot harm the non-living.
Comment by Naumadd
23 hours ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Islam true
If Islam is the true religion, does not the god of Islam have the power to defend himself? Or does he need help from his followers? Is Islam really a religion of PEACE and love
Comment by Mo
3 hours ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Everybody Draw Mohammed Day
I thought, South Park death threats was already over, but I was wrong. Who would have thought that the issue would have a sequel? Today many people are drawing pictures during the, everybody draw Mohammad day. The South Park makers have been receiving death threats since depicting the prophet Mohammad on their show. American's are challenging those creating the threats by taunting them on Facebook. After visiting this Facebook page, I do believe some individuals want to stir the pot a little much. Nevertheless, this is actually the whole idea of this page. I do not know that I myself would be involved in this cause, but I'm not against the choices Americans make, provided that they are legal.
Comment by JovicZ
2 hours ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
truth shell preveil
just tired of muslim parameter of tolarence,peace etc.isnt it muslim,who humilated buddists of afganistan by give a sign in their hand?isnt it them,for whom,we cant practise our religion freely in my country?isnt it them,who believe in jizya??if we give a tax living in your country,u have to tolarate freedom of speech in non muslim country..the world isnt in the stage of arabia,1400 years ago.so that your prophet can get out of this problem by sending his companion for murder..every muslim who knows his religion well,can murder infidel..so that there prophet said,dont make friendship with nonbeliever..if u want to practise your parameter of tolarence,go back to any of your muslim country..
Comment by opotto
16 minutes ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: