The SunBreak
posted 08/05/10 11:38 AM | updated 08/05/10 11:39 AM
Featured Post! | Views: 0 | Comments : 1 | News

Seattle Public Schools: Measure Teachers Twice, Don't Cut Class Size Once

By Michael van Baker
Editor
Recommend this story (0 votes)
Share

One-on-one instruction, a hallmark of public education

From the Research, Evaluation, and Assessment page of the Seattle School District site, I learn the Seattle school district has a Director of Research, Evaluation & Assessment; a Gates Data Fellow; a Senior Data Analyst; a Program Evaluator/Data Steward; a Assessment Systems Analyst, a Student Information Systems Analyst; and a Lead Education Systems Analyst.

None of these people, I'm told, can tell me how many students are in classrooms, and whether class size has grown over the past ten years.

The district can tell me that in October of 2009, Ballard, Garfield, and Roosevelt all had enrollment of over 1,600 students, but they claim that until this year tracking classroom size was done by principals at each school, and the district did not compile those statistics centrally. (They also can't seem to provide an Excel spreadsheet measuring enrollment against school capacity.)

This is surprising to me because in the district's 2009-10 collective bargaining agreement with the Seattle Education Association (SEA), the district agrees that it will "take actions to limit class size to thirty-two (32) students for core classes in grades 6-12." It would seem odd to agree to that without tracking class sizes. Maybe this can be addressed if and when the SEA goes on strike this fall. As Melinda French Gates says, "Evidence gives you an argument for action."

It also raises the question of how--when the district was closing schools last year because "there is currently too little classroom space in North Seattle to meet demand, but too much space in the Central, South, Southeast and West Seattle clusters"--it actually knew that. The district's "Capacity Management" page doesn't contain a single number or percentage related to the district's student capacity.

Research on the effect of class size on the quality of education has become less popular as it's become clearer how expensive a proposition it is. If under 20 students is the optimal size, then given classes of 35 to 40 students, you'd need almost twice the teaching staff.

In 2008, the superintendent of Seattle Public Schools, Maria Goodloe-Johnson, told the Seattle P-I that class size has taken on too much importance, and that "the bottom line is quality of teaching in the classroom."

That's the mantra of the national education reform movement that's predicated on teacher assessment, which has won the approval of the Gates Foundation: "Data show that an effective teacher has more impact on student performance than any other school-based factor." Richard Conlin and Tim Burgess are for it, too.

None of you wants, really, to get into the history of education reform, but one thing reasonable people can agree on is that, to date, no educational reformer has stood up before the public and said, "Data show that the project we're attempting to manage is highly complex and responses to any particular input are non-linear." Today, in other words, it's effective teachers. (You have to like "effective teachers," I mean the adjective says it all.)

There's no question that teachers unions have their thumb on the scale when it comes to seniority and job security. Getting better at weeding out terrible teachers is common sense. As for best practices, Bill Gates has been impressed by the KIPP "method": "The amount of time they spend with the kids really is unbelievable. Between the long day (7:30 to 5) and every other Saturday and three summer weeks it is 60% more than normal schools."

A teacher friend of mine (not with the Seattle school district) is now teaching several classes of over 30 students. Her students have to borrow chairs from the multipurpose room, because more desks won't fit in the room. She's an effective teacher. She will be until the day, not too far from now, when she burns out.

Last year, she had ten juniors and seniors in an essay-writing class of 36 who could not construct a paragraph. That is, she had a full class of students writing at grade level, along with a half-class of students who weren't. She already gives up more than every other Saturday; she already regularly works past 5 p.m. with students on extracurricular activities.

Can we talk about classroom size again?

Save and Share this article
Tags: sea, seattle public schools, data, gates foundation, school district, class, classroom, size, capacity, enrollment, kipp, bill gates, melinda french gates
savecancel
CommentsRSS Feed
As an actual SPS parent...
I find it amazing any kid gets taught anything at all.

Large school systems are caught in a bind because they have to educate all kids. And educating all kids is the morally correct thing to do. But this leads to what I think are unfair comparisons. Comparing a charter school to a regular public school is like comparing a boutique to a big box store. Of course the boutique is going to have more of what you want. But it's also going to lack a lot of things you may need because of how specialized it is. And that's been the case with charter schools -- when some kid outside their specialization pops up, say a kid with undiagnosed dyslexia, they have nothing to offer for support, but you know, the school district does.

I ran into that shopping for a kindergarten last year. I went to what I thought was a fine parochial school, great test scores, diverse, solid teaching... but I mentioned my daughter is showing early signs of ADHD, and it was "we can't help you with that; you're on your own." If you're outside of the norm, you're on your own.

Now, it's not that much better with Seattle Schools, an organization whose communication style can be best described as "written by unicorns and implemented by sasquatches and chaired by Snuffleupagus." That is, if it exists, I haven't seen it. And I've heard stories of people going to the mat repeatedly with the district just to get help mandated under ADA and the Rehab Act. I've heard stories of parents fighting to get their kids 504 plans written and parents fighting to have the 504s removed from their kids files. OTOH, at least they have something to fight.

And at the same time, you have a lot of parents and guardians who really just don't care, and the district is aligned to deal with that plurality. So, when I got read the riot act about my daughter's behavior and then flipped out as a result (since it brought back some painful memories of my elementary school teachers trying to convince my mother to have me institutionalized -- I'm not kidding about this), it took me a while to realize my daughter wasn't the problem. The problem was the district assumed I didn't care, and therefore I must be made to care.

So, with all that, here's what I think about all these damn reform ideas that get half-assed through every couple of years. We should stop it. Let's focus on reforms that have been tested and proven. Like smaller class sizes. Like mentoring teachers and weeding out the burnouts. But more than that, let's focus on getting schools the right way around on leadership.

One thing I've learned is a good school is made up of:
Good principal
Good teachers
Parents who give a damn
A strong PTA
Solid communication on all levels

Any of that falls apart, the school gets bad. And the thing is, Seattle is full of schools where some part of that is going badly. Do-nothing principals. Burned out teachers. Parents that are out to lunch. Weak and ineffective PTA leadership. No communication.

All the charter school crap in the world can't fix these problems. They just shift them to a new venue. Or, they shift the parents and teachers and principals who would do something into places where they can be isolated from the parents and teachers and principals who don't care. And the compartmentalization of America soldiers on.

But, you know, as I'm writing this, I'm realizing there's a far bigger problem: You, collectively, don't care. Maybe you, singular, do care. But you, us, this nation, we don't care. We complain about it all, but our solution is to slash school funding over and over again. We worry about "our future as a nation" but conveniently forget that our future is in school right now. Or maybe education just isn't as important as whatever it is we care about today. Mosques in Manhattan. Taxes. Paris Hilton's latest drunken spree.

Or maybe it's the opposite. We throw money at the solution because we're Good Little Liberals, but we don't ask for a return, and God forbid us from ever asking for assessment because That Destroys Education! Meanwhile, we do nothing to help bolster creativity.

Maybe if we gave a damn about our neighborhood school. Maybe if we just gave a damn.

Let's stop trying to solve the problem like some old patent medicine show -- throw whatever at it and then walk away when it doesn't work. Let's start treating this like cancer -- research, testing, treatment, palliative care, prevention, many cures for many different problems. If we treated cancer the way we've treated the public school system the last 40 years, breast cancer would still be very high and everyone would be smoking like chimneys because lung cancer has nothing to do with tobacco.
Comment by dw
1 day ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: