Seattle Times Can Get to Story
The SunBreak
posted 02/05/10 10:10 AM | updated 02/05/10 10:10 AM
Featured Post! | Views: 0 | Comments : 5 | Politics

Embattled McGinn Advisor Resigns Before Seattle Times Can Get to Story

By Michael van Baker
Editor
Recommend this story (0 votes)

Chris Bushnell (photo via Facebook)

Not only did Publicola break a big story this week, they broke a political appointment: Chris Bushnell resigned yesterday from his position as a senior advisor to Mayor McGinn, a job he held for just over a week. And all the drama happened unbeknownst to Seattle Times readers, which never got around to reporting on the brouhaha until it was over.

Bushnell (aka Chris Haugen) was the previous week responsible for a possible conflict of interest regarding the seawall that led Mayor McGinn to scrap all four existing bids for seawall design and start over. (Bushnell's wife Megan, a marine biologist, works for a consulting firm that was associated with a bid on the seawall project.)

This week, Publicola reported the news that Bushnell had been misrepresenting himself as the holder of a doctorate in economics, both on business cards and on King County materials. (Bushnell's charmed political life as a convicted felon includes working for two years as a King County economist before he got his bachelor's degree in economics. In theory, that is--his University of Washington records are sealed and Bushnell faxed the Times only proof of enrollment.)

While Bushnell's reputation was in bad repair to begin with, it's McGinn who's fast lost face with the public. McGinn's office initially tried to defend Bushnell by noting that he'd never lied to them about having a Ph.D, and, inexplicably, adding that they'd never requested a resume from Bushnell before offering him a six-figure salary.

Even on his advisor's departure, McGinn was quoted as saying he "reluctantly" accepted Bushnell's resignation, as if ongoing, verifiable deceit regarding job qualifications was a personal quirk one learns to appreciate over time. For that matter, the Times says that in an interview, "Bushnell said he had exaggerated his credentials."

No, Mr. Bushnell, exaggeration is when you are a poor economist and claim to be a great one. Exaggeration, at its outer bounds, could be applied to a case of someone who claimed they got their Ph.D at "an Ivy League school," when it was really Amherst. Appearing in public with "Ph.D" after your name when you have not earned a Ph.D is just a lie. We need more self-critical ability than that from public servants.

Save and Share this article
Tags: chris bushnell, mike mcginn, mayor, advisor, publicola, ph.d, degree, conflict of interest
savecancel
CommentsRSS Feed
This reminds me of Dario Fo
From "The Accidental Death of an Anarchist":

INSPECTOR. I believe it! Anyway, take a look at your professional card and prescription list. If I'm not mistaken, they read: "Professor Antonio A. Antonio, Psychiatrist. The Former Professor. University of Padova." Go on, what do you have to say now?

SUSPECT. First of all, I really am a professor. Professor of drawing, ornate and free-hand styles, at the Holy Redeemer night school.

INSPECTOR. Well isn't that nice. Good for you, but it says here, "Psychiatrist!"

SUSPECT Yes, but after the period! Don't you know about syntax and punctuation? Look carefully: Professor Antonio A. Antonio. Period. Then there's a capital P Psychiatrist. Now, you'll admit it isn't acting under false pretenses to say: "I am a psychiatrist." It's like saying, "I'm a psychologist, botanist, vegetarian, arthritic " Do you have a knowledge of Italian grammar and language? You do? Well, then you should know that if someone describes himself as an archaeologist, it's as though he had written "Milanese." It doesn't mean he has a degree in it!

INSPECTOR. All right, but what about Former Professor from the University?

SUSPECT. There, you see - excuse me, but this time you're the one who's acting under false pretenses: you told me that you know Italian language and syntax and punctuation, and then it comes out that you don't even read correctly.

INSPECTOR. What do you mean. I don t know -

SUSPECT. Didn't you see the comma after "The Former"?

INSPECTOR. Oh yes, there is a comma. You're right, I hadn't noticed.

SUSPECT. Aha, "I hadn't noticed" . . . And you, simply because you "hadn't noticed," would throw an innocent man in prison?

INSPECTOR. You know, you really are crazy. (Without realizing it, he has begun to address the SUSPECT in a more respectful tone.) What does the comma have to do with it?

SUSPECT. Nothing, for someone who doesn't know Italian language and syntax! Which reminds me, I'd like to know where you got your degree. And who granted it to you. . . let me finish! The comma, remember, is the key to everything! If there's a comma after "The Former," the entire meaning of the phrase changes at once. After the comma, you have to catch your breath . . . take a brief pause . . . Because "the comma always denotes a pause." Therefore, it should be read, "The Former, Professor," meaning, "the aforesaid, the one already mentioned, NOT the professor." In fact, I haven't been a professor for some time. So that could even be read with a little ironic chuckle: heh, heh. So the correct reading of that phrase is as follows: The Former, Professor, heh, heh. Pause. From the University of Padova. Just the same as if you read "retired dentist, from the city of Bergamo." Because I am from the University of Padova, in the sense that it was the last place I visited: I had just recently come from there when I, ah, took up my psychiatric practice. Any other reading of the phrase would be entirely false and misleading; only an idiot would make such an error.
Comment by Jeremy M. Barker
4 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Amen
Well said. Oncet this moral stuff was taught in journalism classes.
Comment by Josh Petersen
4 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Low bar
'Before the Times gets to the Story'?

Is there any less effective advocate for the local citizen?
Comment by bilco
4 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
amherst
amherst is a liberal arts college that does not grant Ph.D.s so it would be more than exaggeration to claim a doctorate from there!
Comment by liberal arts grad
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: amherst
Isn't that the problem Dave Reichert had last election against Burner? He called b.s. on her double-major in econ, and then it turned out half his bios claim he had a degree from a two-year college?
Comment by Jeremy M. Barker
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: