The SunBreak
posted 12/29/10 02:43 PM | updated 12/29/10 02:43 PM
Featured Post! | Views: 0 | Comments : 8 | Travel

Amtrak Breaking Every Record Except Speed

By Michael van Baker
Editor
Recommend this story (0 votes)
Share

Cameron Booth's "Amtrak Subway Map" (for sale as a poster) beats anything Amtrak has to show you. Sigh.

"134,230 passengers rode Amtrak on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving," crows Amtrak in their pdf press release, "a new record for the single busiest day in the history of the railroad." More than 704,000 passengers took Amtrak over the holiday weekend. In contrast, all the airlines together were expecting to average about 2 million passengers per day during the same period, so Amtrak is pulling a significant share of the holiday traffic load.

Closer to home, ridership on the Amtrak Cascades route jumped 13 percent from last year, largely thanks to the second train added for the Olympics. When the eejits running Wisconsin and Ohio rejected high-speed rail funds, the Cascades route was showered with an extra $161 million, which will be spend on not going slow, or coming to a complete halt. Of particular interest is combating the winter mudslides that occur each winter north of Seattle, and can result in full days without train service (passengers are bused around the slide).

The bulk of our previously allotted "high speed rail" money will be spent on switches allowing passenger trains to bypass the much slower freight trains. That, coupled with track upgrades, should allow top speeds of up to 110 mph. In the U.S., 90 mph qualifies as high speed; in Europe, riders expect nothing slower than 150; China has some 200-plus mph options. Basically, 110 mph is like we've caught up with Japan in 1964.

Save and Share this article
Tags: amtrak, high speed rail, thanksgiving, holiday, record, ridership, passengers, mudslides
savecancel
CommentsRSS Feed
Amtrak
Excellent and interesting article, a welcome antidote to the tiresome canard that "nobody rides trains" and urban myths about "empty Amtrak trains tooling across the landscape".

What I don't quite get, though, is that the title of the article doesn't seem to have much to do with the substance of it. As long as Amtrak is sharing the tracks with freight operations run by Amtrak's landlords, and as long as the FRA imposes speed limits absent expensive signal equipment, there will be limits to how fast the trains can go. Besides, since a train connects all city pairs en route, and a motorist's travel connects one city pair (origin and destination), it's obvious that you oiught to be able to drive faster (thanks to tax-financed Interstates especially), in the absence of true TGV-type high speed trains. Which are extremely expensive to build.
Comment by Andrew Sihler
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: Amtrak
Thanks, Andrew. I know it's not Amtrak's "fault" that they don't own their own tracks, etc., I just wanted to apply a qualifier to all the "high speed" appellations floating around, and point out that Amtrak's focus is really and truly going to be on removing things that make their trains slow and late, rather than trying to achieve speed records. (Sadly, we in Seattle don't have much reason to talk about the actual high speed achievements of the Northeast's Acela.)
Comment by Michael van Baker
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
The six percent solution
So, running at 6% of the airline capacity is a triumph?

Given that everyone hates the airlines, and the train is a better bet in many scenarios (Seattle-Portland, East Coast Corridor, getting Allied POWs out of WWII camps), this isn't exactly a huge triumph.

And yes, I've actually taken the train across country - 3 times I believe.
Comment by bilco
3 days ago
( +1 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: The six percent solution
Hey, they had to up capacity to make that record. So it is a big deal in a way (though, it's not nothing that a single railway can do perhaps 10% of all airlines); the evidence is growing that the main thing holding Amtrak back is that it's not funded at a level that would allow it to meet the real demand that's out there. (Leaving the discussion of on-time reliability to the side.)
Comment by Michael van Baker
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: The six percent solution
yeah, kinda. The comparison vs. all airlines wouldn't be valid if there were several train lines to choose from. But right now, it's state-sponsored Amtrak or the highway.

I sadly think that Amtrak is one of those gov't-run programs that just don't work. 'My Best Ain't Good Enough For You', as they say.
Comment by bilco
3 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Anothr Government Solution
Sadly, you're right. But you don't tell the whole story.

You say, "Amtrak is one of those gov't-run programs that just don't work."

...one of the many!

Our gov't can't run a slow train. How the heck do they think they can run a fast one?

Good money after bad.
Comment by GetReal
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
RE: Anothr Government Solution
Many government programs DO work.

Come on, get real!
Comment by bilco
2 days ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Market Share
So, while 134,000 passengers were on Amtrak and another 2 million were sleeping in airports, ya wanna guess how many people weed in cars? Oh, about 300 million....
Comment by GetReal
1 day ago
( 0 votes)
( report abuse ) ( )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: