No More Dogs in Grocery Stores: A Reasonable Reader Responds

Another alternative to reading HuffPo while having your dog on-leash in the coffeeshop's window: NOT HAVING YOUR DOG IN THE COFFEESHOP, ON THE COFFEESHOP'S WINDOWSILL.
Another alternative to reading HuffPo while having your dog on-leash in the coffeeshop’s window: NOT HAVING YOUR DOG IN THE COFFEESHOP, ON THE COFFEESHOP’S WINDOWSILL.

Nearly a year ago, I encountered an asshole with a puppy in his Safeway cart. Since writing about that experience last February, the story continues to inspire opinionated comments, in spurts here and there (TWSS). The most recent comment, from just a couple days ago, certainly had enough time and forethought invested as to warrant a larger audience and hopefully move this conversation forward. The supportive screed, care of SunBreak commentator Sirophix:

Thanks for the article, Audrey. I think it brings up some really important points for Seattle residents. Personally, I agree that non-service dogs should not be permitted in grocery stores or other food and beverage establishments. I have been an animal-lover my entire life and am hoping to get my first very own puppy this summer. I look forward to taking him out and about–but not inside places that prepare and serve food.

Owners of service dogs have given us stories of their dogs being attacked by non-SDs in public areas, and I think this is horrible. Anyone who has ever encountered a truly trained SD knows it’s not your average pet. I’m sure most people won’t appreciate this comparison, but I would describe service dogs as regular dogs whose sparks have been snuffed out. I say this having only seen SDs for a few moments at a time in very busy, very public situations where absolute adherence to training is essential, so it makes sense that there is no room for any of that spontaneous behavior. After all, someone’s life could be at stake.

Perhaps some people would be willing to compile more comprehensive arguments for their points? Personally my argument is dogs (and I say dogs because I think mini-horses are quite rare as service animals) shouldn’t be in restaurants and grocery stores for two main reasons.

(Whether or not children should be allowed in grocery stores is orthogonal and I don’t think it does anything but cloud the issue. For this reason I am not addressing that argument and its points.)

1) Dogs tend to shed fur and dander and can carry and spread many diseases, some of which can be transmitted to humans. I don’t want these things on my food, clothes, or person when I am purchasing food, drink, or groceries.

I don’t think it’s hypocritical to be accepting of one’s own pets in one’s own home. That said, I ensure the food I prepare in my kitchen does not contain pet hair. I don’t have a la-dee-da attitude with that. Maybe it’s a preference, maybe it’s a mindset–I just don’t want to ingest parts of my pets. And I know where my pets go, what they eat, how often they are cleaned, which vaccinations they have, and what their medical histories are! I don’t know these things about strangers’ pets and I’m enough of a misanthrope that I don’t trust other people to be conscientious owners so I assume the worst.

Here is a list of illnesses people can get from dogs from the CDC’s website.

If my pets were to get a communicable illness for whatever reason, I would not want them to pass it to others. If grocery stores were to allow dogs, it’s very possible they would transform into a short step above common dog parks and the chance for diseases would increase dramatically. In the past few years we’ve had quite a few parvo outbreaks in Western Washington. Here’s just one story from Google.

2) Dogs can behave in unpredictable way, which can result in bites to other animals or people. A dog may also urinate, defecate, vomit, bark, run, or growl, among other undesirable behaviors.

Be honest: pretty much everyone knows another person (or is that person) who has a sketchy dog and this dog will bite. It may be due to anxiety or fear or aggression but it really doesn’t matter–a dog bite often is a very traumatic experience–and very preventable–experience.

The person whose dog bites knows that their dog bites. They try to keep an eye on it. But they can’t watch their dog 100% of the time, especially when their primary focus isn’t their dog but their groceries. So the dog bites someone. And there are actual dog-bite attorneys who are more than happy to help the person sue your buns off.

These behaviors are, of course, extremes. Most behaviors that are encountered every day are not this extreme but are incredibly annoying. A dog that does not respect the boundaries of others is probably #1 on that list. While there are some people who don’t mind a strange dog walking directly to them and smelling their ass, there are some people who do.

Assuming you have a well-groomed, vaccinated, well-behaved dog…

Well, it sucks to be you because there are a lot of people whose dogs are not all of those things. So any time one of these ill-trained beasts misbehaves in public, it gives a bad name to all good dogs and responsible owners. Feel free to address the problem yourself and attempt to restore some dignity to the perception of Seattle dog owners. I personally would be happy to switch things up on a trial basis if all the dogs were properly behaved and maintained.

Of course, trained service dogs don’t have the behavioral problems but may have health issues. Until service dog status–or the health of all dogs–is more tightly regulated, the ADA will continue to provide service dogs with carte blanche on this.

Unfortunately, service dog status is not federally regulated status. I say “unfortunately” because if there were a certification that owners could obtain, then they could very easily count themselves as proud owners of truly licensed, regulated, and trained service animals. Just as a restaurant must pass a variety of health codes, I think it would be incredibly beneficial to regulate service animals: for the dogs, the owners, and the public–both the ignorant and the informed. Fringe benefits could be that all owners also receive a medical ID card or bracelet indicating the services their animal performs in case of accident or emergency, and that this certification could assist in insuring service dogs for the full value in case of accident, illness, injury, or death. (These are, of course, hypothetical.)

It is very possible that if such legislation were to one day be enacted, these canines would be considered the models of behavior for all other dogs. Maybe that would have a ripple effect, where their conduct comes to be accepted as the standard and the minimum level of training expected of all pets is significantly improved.

On a separate issue, I have read conflicting information on how to approach a customer with a dog and whether it is a service animal. The WA State Human Rights Commission site states that the customer may be asked if the animal is required because of a disability. When I worked in a doctor’s office, we were instructed not to ask any questions if a patient were to bring a dog, as even asking questions could open us up in terms of liability.

I hope people continue to examine this issue and their beliefs surrounding it. Open, constructive conversations should always be welcome.

Seattle Chamber Music Society Goes for Baroque

Continuing its adventurous trend this Winter Festival, Seattle Chamber Music Society included in Friday’s concert several composers not heard in this milieu before: Baroque composers Couperin, Rameau, and Scarlatti, all of whom were on the recital program which began the evening’s performance. Telemann’s work appeared on the main concert. One more concert tonight, Saturday, ends this year’s festival, but it’s only six months until the summer festival starts June 29.

Whether the composers or the performer came first in the thinking of artistic director James Ehnes doesn’t matter. Canadian harpsichordist Luc Beauséjour introduced many who might have been unfamiliar with them to his instrument and the fine music of those composers.

It was a particular delight to hear some Rameau, a composer with a vivid sense of hearing the world around him as evidenced here in his Le Rappel des oiseaux (The Recall of the Birds), where you can feel the alarm and reaction of the birds, maybe at the advent of an eagle.

In the main concert, Beauséjour was joined by oboist Nathan Hughes and cellist Robert deMaine for Telemann’s Sonata in A Minor for these instruments. The oboe parts for the second and fourth movements are extremely fast, encompassed with ease and expressively by Hughes, while the cello acts as continuo intrument doubling the harpsichord’s lower line. Both modern cello and modern oboe are louder instruments than their Baroque counterparts and the harpsichord could sometimes only be heard by its timbral effect rather than the actual notes, but the three maintained excellent ensemble and the whole effect was delightful.

Hughes, formerly principal oboe with the Seattle Symphony and now principal oboe for the Metropolitan Opera orchestra, gave a stunning performance of Britten’s Metamorphoses after Ovid for solo oboe, programmed as part of the focus being given to Britten on his centenary.

In six parts, each named after a Roman mythical character, the composer has a great sense of what the oboe can do. Without being flashy the composer portrays parts of each myth, having prefaced the work with a brief sentence describing the action: “Pan plays upon Syrinx, his beloved,” or “Arethusa runing from Alpheus is turned into a fountain.” The work suited Hughes wonderfully, as he played each part as an expressive soliloquy with exquisite phrasing, whether carefree and jaunty,  melancholy or rowdy.

The other two works were more in line with what SCMS programming has always been, well-deserved stalwarts of the classical or romantic repertory, Mozart’s Quintet for Horn and strings in E-flat major, and Schubert’s String Quartet in G Major.

Newcomer to the festival William VerMeulen, French horn, joined violinist Scott Yoo, violists Toby Appel, and Michael Klotz (another newcomer), and cellist Edward Arron for the Mozart. VerMeulen’s horn has a big sound and to some extent it felt out of balance with the strings, though it was not because he was playing loudly.

The Schubert was a pleasure to  hear, with artistic director James Ehnes and Amy Schwartz Moretti, violins, Richard O’Neill, viola, and deMaine, cello. Close ensemble work and attention paid to the way Schubert would have heard this in 1826 gave the performance elegance and lightness in quieter parts which made fine contrasts to more intense sections. At the same time there was irresistible propulsion and plenty of vitality in what was a highly musical performance.

An Astonishing Vision of Chekhov’s “Seagull” at ACT

The Seagull Project-Credit Chris Bennion
The Seagull Project-Fanning- credit Chris Bennion

The cast of The Seagull (Photo: LaRae Lobdell)

John Bogar as Trigorin and Alexandra Tavares as Nina in The Seagull (Photo: Chris Bennion)

Alexandra Tavares as Nina and Brandon Simmons as Konstantin in The Seagull (Photo: Chris Bennion)

Julie Briskman as Arkadina, Peter Crook as Dorn, and Hannah Victoria Franklin as Masha in The Seagull (Photo: Chris Bennion)

There aren’t that many nearly-three-hour shows that I immediately want to see again; The Seagull (at ACT Theatre through February 10; tickets) makes that brief list one production longer. It’s unlike anything else you’re likely to see on Seattle stages in all of 2013. First, there is the sheer talent assembled to take on Chekhov’s 13 characters, and secondly there is the sheer time they’ve given themselves to develop their production: nine months.

No one but actors would be lunatic enough to devote that much time and energy to a single show — that’s why this production is the sole fruit of The Seagull Project, an ensemble that coalesced simply to perform Chekhov’s play. By rights, The Seagull should be as terrible as its 1896 opening night audience thought it was; it’s incredibly talky, with little concrete action taking place on stage. The inciting incident, as it were, is the performance of a “decadent” symbolist play. Everyone’s love is unrequited, to one extent or another. You learn — if you needed the reminder — that it is a drag getting old.

And yet…in the best hands, it’s genius. It’s a play that, in commenting constantly upon itself, teaches audiences how to watch it. Set in summer, its people get bored and restive and long to make definitive plans — to exit the frustratingly formless present and find themselves where things are happening.

Chekhov is foolhardy enough a playwright to elicit that restiveness from his audience, so that they can, too, share in the realization that the present is, as Eliot would later intone portentously, where the meaning is: “Ridiculous the waste sad time / Stretching before and after.” He is also brilliant enough to show you, in his hall-of-mirrors way, that it’s not about being young or old. It’s the human condition.

John Langs gets this; his direction here is almost anti-direction (in the sense of pushing the scene toward this or that end). He lets his cast develop instead, like a photograph in a bath, relationships gradually coming into focus. That cast, having had nine months to steep, delivers performances unmarked by bravura, in terms of spectacle. Their play is as present as a cocktail party you’ve wandered into — as full of unspoken dynamics, half-smiles, chatter, and despair. They wear their natty suits and dresses (costume design by Doris Black) effortlessly, and move about Jennifer Zeyl’s restrained, wooden-planked stage, sparsely furnished, as if they grew up there.

Because so much is nuance, it’s hard to put your finger on at first, why this play feels that different. You have to be willing, as an audience member, to spread your attention to take in these firefly glimpses, to be patient enough for the characters to take shape before you in gestures and behavior. Then they can move you. When he’s performed well, Chekhov transports you to your emotional crisis as immediately as the yeasty scent of a bakery’s fresh bread takes you back to some Parisian quarter.

While not plotless (it’s tightly plotted, in its way, it’s just plot branching out on a fractal scale), The Seagull can be better taken as a spectrometer that measures the properties of fulfillment. Here you have a lightly-bearded, fishing-pole-toting John Bogar as Trigorin, the John Updike of his day, paired up with Julie Briskman, as middle-aged, fabulously dressed star of the stage Arkadina. Trigorin, who’s rueful about his fame and considers his writing an almost oppressive compulsive act, contrasts with Konstantin, played by Brandon J. Simmons as a fractured boychild/artiste. He’s the kind of person drawn to hyphenated activities like writer-director because they present the possibility of power over his mother Arkadina.

In a not unrelated circumstance, Konstantin is desperately in love with Nina (understandably, because she is played by Alexandra Tavares), the ingénue who mirrors Arkadina, just as Konstantin does Trigorin. I’ve always thought the classically-featured Tavares was born to play Chekhov; it’s tiresome to applaud someone for how they look, but “classical” is relevant because Chekhov wrote in several places of the nobility he saw in women dealing with feckless Russian men — that was his iconography. Similarly, Tavares illuminates herself.

Here, she acts acts the part of Nina perfectly, slightly over-enunciating and unselfconscious about her appraisal of everyone in the room, as naive about her own desires as of Trigorin’s. (Briskman’s Arkadina is the opposite of naive — her cajoling of Trigorin to drop Nina I’ve seen elsewhere as desperate submission, but Briskman shows you how she got Trigorin in the first place, by performing for him precisely the kind of woman he wants.)

Nina’s youth lasts for about an hour and forty-five minutes. When she reappears for the short final act, after the intermission, the battering from life she’s undergone is wrenching, but Simmons’ mercurial Konstantin, protesting he loves her still, can only offer her his resentful neediness. If Konstantin ever wanted to know Nina’s heart, Simmons makes clear, he’s almost entirely blinded now by the stunted, childish demands of his own.

Mark Jenkins is Sorin, a stay-at-home country-estate owner, unvisited by a Frank Capra angel sent to explain his life’s meaning to him, and his stewing over time gone by is balanced by Peter Crook’s forward-thinking, stately Dr. Dorn, who has as well spent his life in service but seems at peace with his years, and is open enough to be stirred by Konstantin’s avant-garde efforts. What makes Chekhov Chekhov, though, is that as orderly as this critical recitation sounds, it leaves out the way Sorin sticks up for his nephew Konstantin, it doesn’t discuss the extent to which Sorin’s stewing is related to his physical decline. Be warned that if you have ever loved anyone near the end of his or her life, Jenkins’ fearless portrayal of Sorin will wreck you.

Even the “smaller” characters are given big lives: distinctive, complex, lived-in performances come from Julie Jameson as Polina, who’s married to the estate’s overseer, Shamraev, played by John Abramson, who marvelously captures that character’s yearning in his tic-like references to stars of the past he’s seen. (Because this is Russia, they’re actors and singers — in the U.S., he’d be an encyclopedia of former sports legends, always elbowing you about that time he saw Unitas play against Tennessee.)

Polina, of course, loves the doctor. Her daughter, Masha, played by the formidable Hannah Victoria Franklin, unrequitedly loves Konstantin. She’s angry at everyone and at herself, and Franklin has her guzzling vodka, snorting snuff, and slicing off her unwanted beau’s testicles (metaphorically: Langs lets her get away with a little too much unconventional mannerism but not that) with a lacerating “Really.” That unfortunate man is the school teacher Medvedenko (the lanky, stubbornly placid CT Doescher, delivering one of my favorite performances). Tyler Polumsky, Noah Duffy, and Lindsey Leonard are Yakov and the Servants, providing musical accompaniment as well as performing their household chores.

There is a seagull, and it is a symbol. Konstantin shoots it, because he doesn’t know what else to do, and tries to give it to a Trigorin-and-escape besotted Nina. Nothing lives in Konstantin’s writing, either; it’s all dead on the page. Nina comes to think she is that seagull (it reappears stuffed though, and she is hungry), though if so, it was Trigorin who shot her from the sky, idly. If the play works its magic (assisted by the subtle lighting, dappling in a summer afternoon, pale in winter, by Andrew D. Smith, and the almost subconsciously-generated sound design of Robertson Witmer), you’ll feel the stifling heat of cricket-buzzing summer day. Maybe a half-heard, Russian-sounding tune of Witmer’s will get you there. Bored, you wanted to be anywhere else. By winter, it’s all you can think about.

Stephen Fry Confronts the Warts-and-All Genius of Richard Wagner

Fans of operatic composer Richard Wagner devour and worship his works with an unabashed fervor normally endemic to Deadheads or Star Trek fans.

Wagnerians frequently travel around the world to view stagings of his operas, pore over hours of recordings of his compositions, and scarf up shelves of books covering Wagner’s life and creative output. This town’s done more than its share of stoking that devotion, too: Seattle Opera has built an international reputation performing the composer’s music-dramas (the company re-mounts its lavish staging of Wagner’s epic Ring Cycle this August).

One of those self-confessed Wagner nuts, actor/writer/raconteur Stephen Fry, offers a guided tour of his obsession in Wagner and Me, a fascinating 2011 documentary opening at the Grand Illusion tonight and running through January 31. It’s a combination travelogue, biography, and love letter that reveals as much about its host/narrator as it does its controversial subject.

On the face of it, there’s ample reason for Fry’s adoration. Wagner stood as one of the most important creative figures of the nineteenth century, a composer of towering brilliance who essentially invented things like the leitmotif (one melody that recurs, in slightly varied form, throughout a musical work — think John Williams’ recurring ‘dum dum, dum dum da DUM dum’ theme surfacing in different tempos and instrument combinations throughout Star Wars).

Wagner also wedded that compositional mastery with an incalculably ambitious dramatist’s touch. His monumental four-opera Ring Cycle drew from Germanic and Norse mythology to explore the duality of humanity’s thirst for power and its need for love. Key pieces of the Cycle’s pocket universe were co-opted outright by generations of storytellers (including a chap named Tolkien), and the composer’s melodies have served as indelible soundtracks for everything from cinematic napalm bombings to Bugs Bunny cartoons.

Fry, it turns out, is one hardcore fan. He’s followed Wagner’s oeuvre passionately since the age of twelve, when he heard Tannhauser on his dad’s gramophone, and much of Wagner and Me follows the actor’s first trek to Bayreuth. The South German town serves as “Stratford-upon-Avon, Mecca and Graceland, all rolled up into one” for Wagnerians, housing a grand Opera House built for Wagner by King Ludwig as well as the composer’s gravesite.

Wagner and MeWagner fans should find much to enchant them throughout Wagner and Me. The movie provides a brisk Cliffs Notes on the composer’s life and career, and it frequently hauls out eye-popping vistas in Germany, Russia, and Switzerland. There’s no denying the power and potency of the music on display, and Seattle Opera fans will surely welcome glimpses of noted Wagnerian singers Christopher Ventris and Linda Watson, both of whom performed in the company’s Parsifal in 2003.

Fry’s been given impressive access to the inner workings of the Bayreuth Wagner Festival, and he makes the geeky most of it, whether he’s waxing rhapsodic during rehearsals of Die Walkure or playing the opening chords of Tristan und Isolde on Wagner’s personal piano.

But there’s an exceptionally ugly 800-pound gorilla in the room in the form of Adolf Hitler, whose worship of Wagner tainted (irrevocably, many believe) the composer’s stirring compositions. Wagner and Me goes from simply engaging to quietly riveting when the Jewish-descended Fry addresses the stench of Naziism that continues to hang over the music, as well as the composer/dramatist’s vitriolic anti-Semitism.

Fry’s openly disquieted by both (having lost relatives in the Holocaust), but defends the art in the end, refusing to let the transcendent brilliance of the music be corrupted by racism or the Third Reich.

That astonishing music — and the insights of conductors and artists who’ve helped keep it alive — bolster that idealistic stance, so when Fry attempts to rationalize Wagner’s personal and ideological ugliness, he can’t help but sound a little naive. Yes, Wagner was a creative genius, and an artist doggedly committed to his muse. Yes, he lived in an era rife with casually-accepted anti-Semitism, and much of his prejudicial venom may have been born from personal jealousy over the financial success of his contemporaries, Felix Mendelssohn and Giacomo Meyerbeer (both Jews themselves). But Fry’s assertion that the person most hurt by Wagner’s anti-Semitism was Wagner himself feels like a futile attempt to find some shred of personal decency in an already-unlikeable (and unrepentantly prejudiced) human being.

Leave it to one Wagner scholar, author Chris Walton, to balance admiration with a refreshing gust of practicality. Wagner “may have been a nasty little man, and a nasty anti-Semite,” he states, “but that doesn’t make his music any less supreme.”

For Compagnie Marie Chouinard, the Music Comes First

Choreographer Marie Chouinard performed her own work solo for twelve years before forming her Compagnie Marie Chouinard, developing her highly original style. It’s no surprise, then, that in both works she presented on the UW World Series at Meany Theater Thursday night (repeated tonight and Saturday; tickets), dancers performed individually much of the time, though often not alone on stage.

The two works couldn’t be more different in atmosphere: 24 Preludes by Chopin, and The Rite of Spring, music by Stravinsky. Again, it’s no surprise that Chouinard calls these works by the titles of the music, because for her the music comes first. Her dancers recreate the music in bodily form. If you could hear nothing at all through your ears, you could sense the music through the the way they move, not just the the rhythm but the emotions the music conjures.

Thus, in 24 Preludes, she mirrors each brief prelude as contrastingly as did Chopin.

The dancers are clad in black swim suits, trunks for the four men, one-piece for the six women, with a black strap around each foot which is otherwise bare, and with some fantastical hairstyles including several mohawks. Chouinard uses hands, wrists and fingers frequently and effectively here, sometimes sharply angled, sometimes fluttering, suggesting flight. One prelude has arms raising Heil-Hitler style then going beyond and dissipating the memory, another has the dancers kicking a soccer ball around. Impressions like joy, toughness, ghostliness, athletes, humor, being imprisoned, spasticity all enter the mind.

Superbly trained athletes the dancers are, undeniably. There is huge energy here, as Chouinard uses the whole body in movements fluid or jerky, seemingly easy but requiring great flexibility. At the same time the dancers need to be closely attuned to the music as so much of what they do is dictated by the phrasing, the mood, the rhythms of each prelude. With considerable courage, given the needs of the dance, the company agreed to use live music provided by, in 24 Preludes, UW doctoral student in piano Brooks Tran.

The same courage applied for Rite, where the company used the UW Symphony Orchestra led by its music director Jonathan Pasternack. While the dancers are often performing alone in individual pools of light, there is still a feeling of primitive tribal dance, enhanced when they all come together as a group.

There’s cohesiveness of feeling here but each one is dancing to a personal vision, and above all it’s the music which drives the dance rising out of it. The vigor, the energy, the sexuality inherent without being sexy because it doesn’t seem to be directed at another person, all embody Rite’s music, which shocked the audience 100 years ago this year, and can still take us aback now. It’s merely an unemphasized part of the whole that the female dancers, like the men, wear only black swimming trunks, naked from the waist up.

One prop is used, sparingly. Five curved spikes like fingernails, about a foot long, sprout from a dancer’s hands, elbows and thighs, later from another dancer also. As as they move together, they undulate like jellyfish tendrils. Another time a group of dancers has only has one spike on each hand, a unicorn horn, a penis, a pair of horns.

The originality of Chouinard’s choreography shows starkly in there is one and only one movement, a leap, which appears to derive from classical ballet. Her lighting for Rites is equally imaginative, while for 24 Preludes, it’s achieved by the gifted Axel Morgenthaler.

Gypsy Rose Lee Award-Winners in Local Theatre Announced

The Seattle Theater Writers have announced the winners of the 2012 Gypsy Rose Lee Awards. Nominations for the third annual awards were announced on January 15th.

In addition to the standard categories of achievement the group bestowed a special award for Excellence in Playwriting on Kathy Hsieh in recognition of her serial Sex in Seattle. The show consists of about 40 hours of performance over 20 episodes w the final episode was produced last year.

R. Hamilton Wright in ACT's The Pitmen Painters (Photo: Chris Bennion)
R. Hamilton Wright in ACT’s The Pitmen Painters (Photo: Chris Bennion)

Excellence in Production of a Play (Large Budget):
The Pitmen Painters — ACT Theatre

Excellence in Production of a Play (Small Budget):
Jesus Hopped the A Train — Azeotrope

Excellence in Production of a Musical (Large Budget):
The Producers — Village Theatre

Excellence in Production of a Musical (Small Budget):
Spring Awakening — Balagan Theatre

Excellence in Direction of a Play (Large Budget):
Allison Narver — Or, — Seattle Repertory Theatre

Excellence in Direction of a Play (Small Budget):
Desdemona Chiang — Jesus Hopped the A Train — Azeotrope

Excellence in Direction of a Musical (Large Budget):
Steve Tomkins — The Producers — Village Theatre

Excellence in Direction of a Musical (Small Budget):
Eric Ankrim — Spring Awakening — Balagan Theatre

Excellence in Performance as a Lead Actor (Large Budget):
David Hogan — The Art of Racing in the Rain — Book-It Repertory

Excellence in Performance as a Lead Actor (Small Budget):
Richard N. Sloniker — Jesus Hopped the A Train — Azeotrope

Excellence in Performance as a Lead Actress (Large Budget):
Jennifer Lee Taylor — Pygmalion — Seattle Shakespeare Company

Excellence in Performance as a Lead Actress (Small Budget):
Mary Ewald — Happy Days — New City Theater

Excellence in Performance as a Supporting Actor — any non-lead (Large Budget):
Nick DeSantis — The Producers — Village Theatre

Excellence in Performance as a Supporting Actor — any non-lead (Small Budget):
Dumi — Jesus Hopped the A Train — Azeotrope

Excellence in Performance as a Supporting Actress — any non-lead (Large Budget):
Jeanne Paulsen — Pygmalion — Seattle Shakespeare Company

Excellence in Performance as a Supporting Actress — any non-lead (Small Budget):
Nike Imoru — Titus Andronicus — upstart crow

Excellence in Performance as an Ensemble (Large Budget):
Or, — Seattle Repertory Theatre (Kirsten Potter, Basil Harris, Montana von Fliss)

Excellence in Performance as an Ensemble (Small Budget):
Kittens in a Cage — Annex Theatre (Francesca Mondelli, Katie Driscoll, Lisa Viertel, Laurel Ryan, Tracy Leigh, Erin Pike, Erin Stewart)

Excellence in Set Design (Large Budget):
Scott Bradley — Clybourne Park — Seattle Repertory Theatre

Excellence in Set Design (Small Budget):
Deanna Zibello — Jesus Hopped the A Train — Azeotrope

Excellence in Costume Design (Large Budget):
Catherine Hunt — Or, — Seattle Repertory Theatre

Excellence in Costume Design (Small Budget):
Katie Hegarty — The Fairytale Lives of Russian Girls — WET

Excellence in Lighting Design (Large Budget):
L.B. Morse — Hedda Gabler — Intiman Theatre

Excellence in Lighting Design (Small Budget):
Amiya Brown — The Skriker — Janice Findley Productions

Excellence in Sound Design (Large Budget):
Evan Mosher — The Bells — Strawberry Theatre Workshop

Excellence in Sound Design (Small Budget):
Michael White Hayes — Team of Heroes: Behind Closed Doors — Annex Theatre

Excellence in Musical Direction (Large Budget):
Jmichael — Pullman Porter Blues — Seattle Repertory Theatre

Excellence in Musical Direction (Small Budget):
Kimberly Dare — Spring Awakening — Balagan Theatre

Excellence in Choreography or Movement (Large Budget):
Kristin Bohr Holland — The Producers — Village Theatre

Excellence in Choreography or Movement (Small Budget):
Pat Graney — The Skriker — Janice Findley Productions

Excellence in Local Playwriting
S.P. Miskowski — Emerald City — Live Girls! Theater

Excellence in Local Composing
Christian “Lil Kriz” Beeber — Jesus Hopped the A Train — Azeotrope