Coinstar Kiosks Transmogrifying Into PayPal ATMs

(Image: PayPal-Coinstar)
(Image: PayPal-Coinstar)

Bellevue-based Coinstar has announced some of their coin-counting kiosks are being upgraded to “conveniently and securely add coins and paper currency into or withdraw funds from [a] PayPal account, as well as send money to another PayPal account.”

If you use a Coinstar kiosk as a PayPal ATM, it prints out a voucher you can redeem in-store for cash. Like so many other ATMs, though, there are rules and fees: “Withdrawals are limited to $500 in a calendar month and $200 per day; each withdrawal incurs a $3 fee.”

PayPal will accept up to $500 in counted coins and paper money per month, minus Coinstar’s usual 9.8-percent fee for counting coins or a $3 charge for paper bills up to $300, $6 for more than $300. Funds can be deposited directly into a customer’s PayPal account, and even sent right then as payment to another PayPal account. (There’s no day-delay as when you transfer money from your bank to PayPal or vice versa.)

PayPal and Coinstar had mentioned last May that they were testing the service (PayPal has also infiltrated your Xbox and Home Depot), and the results were encouraging: 40 percent of the people who tried the PayPal feature returned to use it at least two times a month. Early kiosks have already been rolled out in Texas, Northern California, and Ohio; the process continues throughout all Coinstar regions.

Use this Coinstar/PayPal ATM locator — there’s a sign-up to be alerted when they come to your neighborhood. Seattle does not seem to have any yet, but then neither does putative home-base Bellevue.

If you haven’t poked around with a Coinstar machine lately, they maintain a substantial list of e-certificate partners who’ll pay that 9.8 percent fee for you, by the way. Besides any number of grocery chains, there’s Amazon, Starbucks, Lowe’s, iTunes, Banana Republic, The Gap, Old Navy, and Sears.

Two years ago, I recommended Coinstar (CSTR) as an investment because while their business was stable, and their ownership of Redbox was likely to see growth, the stock price had dipped to around $38. Today it’s at $51.50, with revenues likely to increase as PayPal customers discover Coinstar convenience. In 2011, Coinstar’s objective was simply to find a way to bring people back to their kiosks more than every six months when the penny jar was full. If the numbers from their early adopters in Dallas hold true — drawing twice-monthly visits — Coinstar’s revenue is about to get a boost.

Zagat and Broiler Bay Burger Disappointment

broilerbay-640-3948The Internet, and its readers, love lists. Restaurant lists are especially popular. I get it: These posts generate a lot of hits, a lot of discussion, and a lot of debate. “They liked what?” and “How did my favorite place not make the list?” are among the typical outcries.

Read some lists, and you’ll wonder if the authors were local, visited all of the contenders, or even ate at the restaurants she or he are recommending. I’m sometimes asked to compile such lists, and it’s admittedly hard to get everywhere to make sure I’ve done exhaustive research. Heck, it’s hard enough to eat a good representation of food within even one restaurant.

In 2010, USA Today asked me to choose one great burger joint in Washington state for a national list. “Great” can mean a lot of things, so evaluating overall burger experiences, I selected Fife’s Pick-Quick Drive In for its iconic feel and overall quality of food. Pick-Quick is not necessarily the number one burger in the state, but a fun place for a burger, fries, and shake.

Last week, Zagat listed its choice of best burgers in 25 cities. Strangely enough, the Zagat slideshow only pictures three actual burgers, and its pick for Seattle is actually in Bellevue: Broiler Bay. Displaying only an interior shot, I shot over to Serious Eats’ coverage of the Zagat list, where you can click through to see more of those “best” burgers, including Broiler Bay’s.

Both sites have comments full of strong criticism for the picks, and I couldn’t agree more, especially for the Seattle area. Check out Broiler Bay’s burger at Serious Eats, and it’s immediately evident that the patty is pre-formed, frozen and looking far from delicious.

Still, I’m a sucker, so I went to try out a cheeseburger myself this past weekend. At the counter, I could see the cook working with pre-formed patties separated by paper dividers. Besides being thin, they were too dense—a cardinal sin for burgers. Patties should be loosely packed, creating more surface area which enables browning and crisping of the meat. This also allows the cheese to ooze into the nooks and crannies of the patty.

broilerbay-half-640-3951Broiler Bay’s patty gets good grill marks, but by default is cooked longer than I prefer, more like a medium-well. The cheese is simple but thrown on late, so it takes time to melt. There’s lots of shredded iceberg lettuce and out-of-season tomato, but no sign of the promised onions. The burger is also said to come with ketchup and mayonnaise, but wanting more flavor, I found myself dipping it in fry sauce, which has a slight tanginess that I’d guess comes from sour cream.

Broiler Bay uses a Franz Bakery sesame seed hamburger bun. It’s fairly non-obtrusive, and a far better choice than the dreaded brioche bun, which is often dry and unable to hold up when the beef juices run. But given that the Franz bun is broader than the thin patty, the burger suffers from the same bad bread-to-meat ratio that a brioche bun creates.

I’m shocked that Zagat would choose Broiler Bay as one of the best burgers in 25 cities. While it might make a decent showing in Bellevue, I wouldn’t even place it in the top 25 of the Seattle area.

If you like lists and want to have your say on Seattle’s best burgers, head over to Seattle Weekly’s Voracious blog. There you’ll find 64 truly Seattle burgers, from Dick’s to Metropolitan Grill, competing in a burger bracket. The public will whittle down the bracket to a final four, and then the Weekly’s food writers (myself included) will have a taste-off to anoint a winner. My personal favorite is currently Li’l Woody’s, and I’ll be interested to see how it fares with the competitors.

Home-Grown Rock Musical “These Streets” Gets it Right

These_Streets
These_Streets2
These_Streets3

Eden Schwartz as Ingrid in These Streets, with Mitch Ebert, Fiia McGann, Gretta Harley (Photo: Stacey Wescott)

Sarah Rudinoff as Kyla in These Streets, with Mitch Ebert, Fiia McGann, Gretta Harley (Photo: Stacey Wescott)

(sitting) Peter Richards, Holly Wong-Wear, Evan Crockett, Terri Weagant (standing) Samie Detzer in These Streets (Photo: Stacey Wescott)

These_Streets thumbnail
These_Streets2 thumbnail
These_Streets3 thumbnail

In the late 1980s, Seattle looked very different than it does now. The Columbia Center had just opened in March of 1985, alarming downtown, which had in a Scandinavian way reached an unspoken agreement against growing too tall. Nordstrom was still known for shoes. And the town had a blue-collar streak that was in its last throes as a cultural force (in contrast, today’s lists of dive bars read like an endangered species list).

Capitol Hill had a strong stock of decrepit old mansions and 4-to-6-bedroom homes that owners had purchased as investments, and would rent out at rates that paid for the mortgage. With no particular demand for them, older apartment buildings, all seemingly run by half-cracked pensioners, rarely raised their rents — it was understood that conditions there were only going to get worse.

But you could get by, and a lot of high school and college graduates did, working a part-time service job while they pursued other interests. Seattle was not a place for “strivers,” as Bryan the dj/oral historian says in These Streets (through March 10), the new rock musical down at ACT Theatre. He’s one of the volunteer on-air talent at KCMU.

But nonetheless, Seattle developed a brand — its icon, a slacker-outcast tortured by the demands of authenticity and intimacy — that a glam-pop music industry crushed to its breast like a cleansing asp. Brands and icons can hide as much as they reveal, These Streets reminds you. It wasn’t all grunge, it wasn’t all scruffy guys in knit caps.

The musical provides a then-and-now view. Finding that the women of Seattle’s grunge era have been overlooked, present-day Bryan has been collecting interviews with them as they reminisce about the time, and the show flashes back to a fictional “Seattle Six,” united by music. Conceived by Gretta Harley and Sarah Rudinoff (who also wrote it, along with Elizabeth Kenny), it’s a tribute to the survivors as much as the fallen, and a belated chance to hear how it “really” was — Bryan’s interviews are based on real-life interviews they did with more than 40 people.

It’s not that the women rockers were waiting quietly to speak their minds but maybe they “didn’t fit the narrative.” (There’s even friction as being misremembered as part of the Riot Grrl movement that blossomed in Olympia, which was also DIY, and whose musical exponents you could hear on KRS.)

The musical includes guitar-laden songs from 7 Year Bitch (“Knot”), Bell (“Transit”), Capping Day (“Visions of Mary”), The Gits (“While You’re Twisting, I’m Still Breathing”), Hammerbox (“When 3 Is 2”), Kristen Barry (“Seeing Gun”), and Maxi Badd (“Righteous”), to name a few, performed by Harley, Ron Rudzitis (guitar, vocals), Fiia McGann (bass, vocals), and Mitch Ebert (drums). It’s loud, but not as loud as in a club, if you’re wondering about ear plugs, and Robertson Witmer’s sound design is actually superior to what you might hear in a few clubs.

The set from Montana Tippett looks like a dive bar stage, raised a few feet, the front plastered with show posters; they’re also affixed to a leaning telephone pole that, with years stapled to it, keeps the chronology straight. Robert Aguilar’s lighting plays up Seattle gloom against the rock-show lights, maybe offering a bit more variety than Seattle venues do even today. The dance floor, once it gains a couch and an old wooden cable-spool (wired Seattle’s version of the wagon-wheel coffee table) becomes a house’s living room. If you’re of a certain age, Harmony Arnold’s costumes will look all too familiar.

Harley and Rudinoff (who songwrite for their band We Are Golden), have also supplied a few original numbers to help set scenes, or, in the case of the valedictory “Diamond,” to bring the whole thing to a halt as Rudinoff rummages around in your tear ducts and squeezes.

Director Amy Poisson has a lot on her plate to tie together the interview excerpts, and the trials and tribulations of the group of musicians (young) and (older). But the show is surprisingly coherent and many-layered, never bogging down in minutiae of the moment or pressing too strenuously for a dramatic conflict. What’s perhaps most appealing about the show is its truthfulness, its grounded nature, and the interplay between the past and present.

In These Streets, that’s given corporeal form by the two age-sets of characters: Evan Crockett plays Bryan in his youth, slightly standoffish but intensely curious about the music scene, while John Q. Smith gives him a world-weary air, though he’s still fired up by the music and the women who made/make it.

There’s also over-achieving Christine (the ineffably wonderful Terri Weagant), who ages terrifically into the regal-but-brass-knuckled Imogen Love; gangly young siren Kyla (Hollis Wear-Wong) who hooks up with Jarrad (Peter Richards); the dredlocked, activist-minded Dez (Samie Detzer), taken on by Elizabeth Kenny; and the self-medicating, fierce Ingrid (Eden Schwartz) who mellows into Gina Malvestuto’s portrayal of her as a still fiery ex-alcoholic who has music in her bones. Rudinoff is the older version of Kyla, fun at a party, but who comes alive most in a song about just carrying on.

The fictional group of musicians meet each other, move into a house (or in together), start to learn the ropes of live shows and low-budget tours, and then, as the industry’s spotlight searches Seattle for grunge talent, watch as some rise and some fall, and some just keep on keeping on. The show ducks the heroin use that was so prevalent, but throughout, it peppers you with astringent observations about class and gender and fame’s fraying of social ties. As a tapestry of the era, the show never tries to mold itself into the standard rock-musical model — it’s an ensemble piece times two, miles and miles away from, say, Jersey Boys.

But then, that’s what you would hope for a musical that came out of Seattle, that it have Seattle in its bones. (In the lobby is a Who’s Who of Seattle’s women in rock from the time that’s worth walking through.) No one else could have created this.

He Was Pointing His Handgun Into the Air When It “Went Off.”

Screen Shot 2013-02-26 at 10.33.09 AMNow that Adam Lanza has forced a national discussion of gun safety, people are scrambling to get their talking points in order. One pro-gun perspective was that cars kill more people than guns; I addressed that in “What Kills More People in Washington State: Cars or Guns?” because it’s not true: in Washington, gun deaths (including suicide) outnumber vehicle fatalities.

The number of people who succeeded in killing themselves with a gun, I thought, was worth emphasizing because it highlights that guns, though used for target shooting and sport shooting, are terrific for killing things without going through a lot of rigamarole. Handguns especially.

We may tend to think of people who commit suicide as fated, in some way, to end it all. But what the U.S.’s gun ownership experiment (89 firearms per 100 people) teaches us is that we’re not nearly as rational as we like to believe. On any given day, any one of us could sink into a black-dog mood that, with a gun in hand, could prove fatal. No one likes to think that. Everyone is healthy as an ox until they’re sick.

That doesn’t mean we can’t discuss how to keep guns out of the hands of the chronically suicidal, just that that alone isn’t likely to dent the magnitude of the problem. (Especially, as one commenter noted, with the alarming tendency of new medications, even those for asthma or epilepsy, to bring on sudden suicidal ideation.)

Suicide, though, is an extreme case of unreason. Here’s something much more common. Last night on Capitol Hill, a 33-year-old man who’d been drinking got into an argument with his roommate. He told officers “he was pointing his 9mm handgun into the air when it ‘went off.’  The round entered the ceiling of the bedroom. Fortunately, the apartment is on the top floor,” concluded the police report, drily.

“It just went off,” sounds like something you’d say in those circumstances. But it’s often true — people don’t consciously pull a trigger, especially when under the influence of something; it’s more of an instinctual reaction. Last night’s ceiling shooting was classified as domestic violence. End of January, there was another 33-year-old man, and another domestic violence scene, that resulted in a death.

In a USA Today story on the 934 deaths in mass shootings the last seven years — 146 cases where four or more people were killed — another troubling statistic comes to light. Did 71 of those shooters walk into a gun store planning on killing members of their family? In an analysis of 56 mass shootings since 2009, researchers found 57 percent were due to domestic violence. How do you screen a potential gun owner for their tendency toward domestic violence?

The same USA Today story quotes Northeastern University criminologist James Alan Fox, who is pessimistic about better mental healthcare reining in spree killers: “Mass murderers won’t take you up on treatment. They tend to externalize and blame other people for their problems. They blame the spouse, the co-workers, immigrants. They feel persecuted.”

It seem like there might be more of a spectrum in play, when it comes to externalization and blame and a dependence of guns. Listen to the NRA’s leadership: 

“Latin American drug gangs have invaded every city of significant size in the United States. Phoenix is already one of the kidnapping capitals of the world,” he explains in his latest expression of anguish, an Op-Ed published in the Daily Caller yesterday. […]

“Hurricanes. Tornadoes. Riots. Terrorists. Gangs. Lone criminals,” he continues. “These are perils we are sure to face — not just maybe. It’s not paranoia to buy a gun. It’s survival.”

It’s not paranoia to want to keep guns out of the hands of people with paranoid and disturbed personalities. It’s survival. But for gun safety, the question is how to keep guns out of all of our hands when we’re not ourselves. I don’t know the answer to that, or at least, an answer that preserves the access to guns Americans “enjoy” now. But I do know that that is problem we face, being human and prone to human failures — handguns will continue to magnify the damage of each and every one of these lapses.

Getting a Bead on Our Improbable Weather

NWS, brought to you by Geocities
NWS forecast excerpt, design by Geocities?

It’s supposed to be showery and windy today, according to the National Weather Service, with up to a foot of new snow in the Cascades. But then these are the people who believe that, in 2013, this is a perfectly acceptable graphic (see right) for a government agency to produce. (It’s good that “impacts” is in yellow, all caps, and underlined, but you notice right away that it still needs a tag.)

University of Washington meteorologist Cliff Mass has bigger fish to fry with the NWS than yellow type on a red background; he’s produced a series of posts on what he calls a “weather prediction gap.” The European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF), he argues, is turning out verifiably better predictions of U.S. weather than the U.S. Global Forecast System (GFS). Hurricane Sandy? Nailed it.

In his latest post, Mass discusses “numerical weather prediction,” or forecasts based on running mathematical models, which in his mind is the future of meteorology. High-resolution modeling can pick out the chance of freak storms developing, but the process is supercomputer-time intensive, i.e., expensive. Ironically, much more processing time is being giving over to climate change research currently (ironic, that is, given the lack of effect the data generated is having on policy).

If it’s good enough for climate change, suggests Mass, despite the uncertainty in looking out over decades to come, surely it’s worth providing the funding to take a high-resolution look at the next 72 hours. As it is, this de facto outsourcing of meteorology computing means that we’re spending more and more money on weather prediction “products” from abroad, which serves to advance those efforts at the expense of our own.

(Graphic: "PROBABILITY OF PRECIPITATION: Assessment and Enhancement of End-User Understanding")
(Graphic: “PROBABILITY OF PRECIPITATION: Assessment and Enhancement of End-User Understanding”)

But even that is not the end of the long pilgrimage toward accurate prediction. People still remain a stumbling block when it comes to probabilistic forecasts, which is what the models produce. (A model might literally be run a 100, a 1,000 different times to create a percent-chance view of the weather.)

Mass references a UW study (pdf), led by psychology professor Susan Joslyn, that found that people struggle with what the probability expressed in a “75 percent chance of rain” applies to. People were very suggestible that it might possibly refer to the amount of time that it might rain, or that it might apply to where it might rain in a given area, instead of what’s really meant, which is that, under these atmospheric conditions, it would rain 75 times out of a hundred.

It’s a statement that makes much more sense if you realize that weather prediction happens on a computer these days — it’s not a guesstimate. Variables are plugged in and tested, and 75 times out of a 100, the model rains. (In Seattle, that’s probably true of 75 percent of forecasts. No, we kid.)

Write the study authors: “If the user misinterprets the probabilistic forecast as deterministic and no precipitation is observed, it could be regarded as a false alarm, reducing trust in subsequent forecasts.” For a dramatic portrayal of this exact dynamic, we refer you to “Coffee’s for Meteorologists Only.”

Tomorrow, by the way, ought to be dry and cloudy.

Note to Pacific MusicWorks & SDP: Bring Back “Wayward Sisters”

Wayward_Sisters2
Wayward_Sisters1
Wayward_Sisters3

Pacific MusicWorks and Seattle Dance Project's Wayward Sisters (Photo: Karin Brookes)

Pacific MusicWorks and Seattle Dance Project's Wayward Sisters (Photo: Karin Brookes)

Pacific MusicWorks and Seattle Dance Project's Wayward Sisters (Photo: Karin Brookes)

Wayward_Sisters2 thumbnail
Wayward_Sisters1 thumbnail
Wayward_Sisters3 thumbnail

Pacific MusicWorks’ program titled Wayward Sisters has been four years incubating, but the result Friday night was well worth the wait.

The concert included four sopranos, three dancers and three musicians, but the strands gathered to present the performance ratcheted up this year’s noticeable trend in presenting companies: collaboration.

Performing 17th and late-16th century songs for one, two, or three sopranos, the singers joined three dancers in movement choreographed by Anna Mansbridge to illustrate the words. The small black box-style stage at Langston Hughes Performing Arts Center, lit by Connie Yun, perfectly set off their costumes by Christine Smith, inspired by a 1394 painting.

Over a cream-colored long-sleeved underdress, square-necked and bordered in dark brown, each singer wore a straight, waisted, light-brown overdress with a laced bodice. The dancers wore a deep blue velvet overdress, long sleeved and very plain, over a cream-colored shift with simple pearl decorations in their hair.

Stephen Stubbs, artistic director of PacificMusicWorks, and Mansbridge, artistic director of Seattle Early Dance, had been working together in workshops, the former teaching Baroque and Renaissance vocal performance while Mansbridge choreographed their movements. Deciding to do such a collaboration with professional singers and dancers led, in Stubbs’ words, to “a very exciting encounter between 17th century music and modern performance.”

Pacific MusicWorks spearheaded and presented Wayward Sisters with Mansbridge,  dancers from Seattle Dance Project (co-founded five years ago by Pacific Northwest Ballet retiree Timothy Lynch), composer Karen P. Thomas of Seattle Pro Musica, costume designer Smith (last seen working on the Roméo et Juliette costumes for PNB), and lighting designer Yun (often in the lighting credits for Seattle Opera).

The 270-seat theater, which is steeply raked with excellent sightlines and equally excellent acoustics, turned out to be a fine choice of venue.

The germ for the project came from 16th-century Italy, where for the first time a trio of sopranos performed in private for the Este court, while a similar trio later entertained at a splendiferous Medici wedding in 1589, and a mother-daughters trio several decades later in Mantua.

The sopranos, Shannon Mercer, Teresa Wakim, Erin Calata, and Catherine Webster were joined by a side-stage singer, Julianna Emanski, who at the last moment came in to sing for Webster who had laryngitis. Webster was able, however, to be on stage moving with her colleagues, lip-synching, so that it was easy to forget someone else was singing for her. Kudos to Emanski for her good work.

The music was glorious. From the Medici wedding came the “Ballo del gran duca” by Cavalieri, performed by all the singers who joined with the dancers who wove around and between them, swirling with flowing arms. Ensuing pieces, by Domenico and Virgilio Mazzochi, Luigi Rossi, Monteverdi’s great “Lamento d’Arianna,” and a scene from Rossi’s Orfeo for Euridice, alternated with dance alone, or with instrumental works.

All the singers, trained in Renaissance and Baroque style, sang with rich, expressive voices but without vibrato. Their pitch sense was extraordinary. There is nowhere to hide when singing this way, and intervals were pure, harmonies and lines exquisite. As for emotion, both vocal and physical, though the lights were down in the audience it was easy to ascertain what was being expressed, from joy to despair, bereavement and grief, even at one point an expression of being ready to kill, so furious was the protagonist.

The dancers, Elizabeth Cooper, Alexandra Dickson, and Ellie Sandstrom, brought finely trained bodies to the choreography, which was more timeless in style than with any particular connection to the dates of the songs, but which brought their meaning to a visual realization. It was fluid, yearning, graceful, sad or sprightly, and at one point one could see some yoga-derived moves.

Stubbs, playing lute or guitar, Maxine Eilander, harp, and David Morris playing bass viola da gamba or lirone (a similar instrument, fretted and with about 13 strings and two drone strings), accompanied the singers and dancers with superb performances of the several songs and dances as well as a couple of solos.

By no means least in this embarrassmant of artistic riches came a new work composed by Karen P. Thomas for Pacific MusicWorks for this configuration of singers and instruments. She set a poem by 17th-century English metaphysical poet Andrew Marvell, “Dialogue between the Soul and the Body,” each complaining of the limitations the other places on it.

Thomas made the most of it, including many word paintings, such as a sudden drop on the last syllable of “precipice,” a bunch of shudders on “shake,” and twice the speed on repetitions of “double.” You can imagine what she did with “cramp.” As always with Thomas, this was composed and executed with imagination, skill, and musical interest.

There was only the one performance of Wayward Sisters planned, but it’s to be hoped the program will be repeated some time. It’s far too good, too polished and seamless a production, too fascinating with so much to take in and enjoy, to be allowed to die now.