Recent Stories with tag jim kastama

Governor Gregoire

A few days ago, the Seattlepi.com's Joel Connelly was scolding Mayor McGinn for his "gratuitous personal insult directed at Gov. Chris Gregoire." At a press conference, McGinn said, "I don't believe we can trust the governor" to protect Seattle against cost overruns from the deep-bore tunnel project. The governor's spokesman Cory Curtis said that Gregoire simply doesn't believe overruns are a threat to Seattle. 

That would be news to anyone who's spoken with the state legislature. The latest lawmaker to go on record vowing to make Seattle pay for any excess costs is Rep. Larry Seaquist, a Democrat from Gig Harbor. Seaquist told the Seattlepi.com, "I will be among those who make damn sure that deal stands in place. We bought our own bridge, you can buy your own tunnel" (a reference to funding of the second Tacoma Narrows Bridge). 

Gov. Gregoire has mounted lawyerly arguments against the possibility of cost overruns, saying things that sound like there's little possibility of such a thing ever happening, and heaping scorn on McGinn as a foot-dragger. "What could cause a cost overrun? Delay," said the governor, despite the fact that, when it suits WSDOT, a year's extension to the project's timeline is spun as bringing costs down.

Gregoire has also called the specific provision "unenforceable," which may be technically true. But it's also disingenuous. The Legislature is perfectly capable of writing an enforceable provision, and Sen. Jim Kastama (another Democrat) went on record over a year ago to say, if costs exceed the budgeted amount, Seattle will pay. Note that these are both Democrats, and that recent Republican wins have cut into the Democratic majority in both House and Senate.... (more)

State senator Jim Kastama (D-Puyallup) wrote a deep-bore op-ed for the Seattle Times a few days ago, wanting to set the record straight about whether Seattle taxpayers were on the hook for cost overruns on the Viaduct-replacing tunnel.

Despite what you may have heard during the mayoral race, Kastama says, if you're a Seattle property owner who "benefits" from the tunnel, you're still on the hook. In fact: "I am drafting legislation that will clarify Seattle's obligation in no uncertain terms and provide them options for local funding sources."

Kastama makes many sensible points, but I think he and history part ways when he says, "Seattle chose an approach inherent with a history of huge cost overruns." Mayor Greg Nickels went to Olympia with a surface/transit plan to sell; it was Governor Gregoire and the legislature that chose the deep-bore option for us, claiming that SR99 was too "vital" a corridor to be left to the whims of Seattle yokels.

Kastama is united with state House speaker Frank Chopp, against... (more)

Seattlepi.com tipped me to news from the Dave Ross Show that at least one state lawmaker, Sen. Jim Kastama (D-Puyallup), doesn't think Seattle will wriggle out of deep-bore tunnel cost overruns.

It's a measure of how worried everyone is about the hot-potato tunnel project that no one wants to admit responsibility for its cost. In the face of a study that shows typical cost overruns at 30 percent or more, Seattle tunnel boosters have been downplaying the possibility that Seattle might be, legally, on the hook.

Rep. Judy Clibborn told Ross today the cost overrun requirement wasn't a legal amendment, according to the state attorney general. "...[T]hat would seem to be trying to trick people into thinking that they're protected when they're not," responded a bemused Ross. "It was a way to get three more votes and to get the tunnel bill passed," explained Clibborn. "[...] We did whatever it took to get it."

Ross spoke next with Sen. Kastama, who said that while he had been unaware that the amendment wasn't legal, it didn't make much difference to him, practically speaking. He assured Ross that the Senate Transportation Committee had already committed all it was going to to the project.

Knowing that transportation funds would be trending lower--along with gas tax revenues--Kastama said they "saw the need to cut significant funds in the transportation budget." But while the state cut almost every other transportation project in the face of our $9 billion deficit, it did not cut the original $2.4 billion allocated for the Viaduct's replacement.

The cost overrun amendment was a response to there being no money to pay for real projects across the state, let alone cost overruns on a single one. (For context, 30 percent of $1.9 billion for the deep-bore tunnel alone is $570 million, or a new total of $2.5 billion.)... (more)