Tag Archives: annabelle lopez Ochoa

A Third-Degree Slow Burn, at Whim W’Him

Spark
This_Is_Real_Bartee

Lara Seefeldt and Jesse Sani in Olivier Wevers' FRAGMENTS (Photo: Bamberg Fine Art)

Andrew Bartee in Annabelle Lopez Ochoa's L'Effleuré (Photo: Bamberg Fine Art)

Andrew Bartee and Tory Peil in Olivier Wevers' I Don't Remember a Spark (Photo: Bamberg Fine Art)

Mia Monteabaro, Tory Peil, and Sergey Kheylik in Andrew Bartee's This Is Real (Photo: Bamberg Fine Art)

The light seems to drip down planes that are the front and back of Andrew Bartee, at the outset of L’Effleuré. Lighting designer Michael Mazzola catches Bartee from all angles throughout the course of Annabelle Lopez Ochoa’s dance piece, whether “elastic technician” Bartee is soaring in a leap or sinking to his haunches in a grand plié, pulsing slightly to a rhythm like breathing or heartbeat. A sinuous movement travels slowly through his core, a leg extends skyward, he pirouettes — all with the gravitas of someone not simply at home in his skin, but almost too-exquisitely aware of it (with his back to the audience, Bartee manipulates his shoulder blades, and skin transmits the subcutaneous movement).

L’Effleuré is a mash-up of referents — it’s French for lightly touched, or caressed, but the program notes mention Louis XIV, the Sun King, too. The strutted torsions are about a muscular elegance, the rose-petal palms and rose-mouth advertising an easily-bruised sensitivity. (It looks great, but Bartee confesses afterward he’s mainly trying not to drool as he bites down on the stem.) At one point, Bartee sinks forward on his knees, his palms up as if in supplicating prayer, and then they look like rose stigmata. The music is Vivaldi’s “Stabat mater dolorosa,” so the stigmata may not be unintended, though here they are transformed.

The other stand-out work in Whim W’Him’s program Third Degree (last weekend at the Seattle Center Playhouse) was Olivier Wevers’ I don’t remember a spark, a journey through dark and contradictory crevices in the choreographer’s mind. The work grew out of a wide-ranging interview Wevers had sat through; it begins with Tory Peil entering the stage through an aisle in the audience’s seating area, white suitcases in tow. She cocks her head and freezes as a Wevers voiceover says, “I don’t remember a spark.”

It’s full of wry humor and deprecating touches, but undeniably also suffused with sadness and dislocation. As Peil gains the stage and perches on her suitcase, other dancers enter, one by one, with their luggage and shoo Peil from place to place. You hear the sound of travelers in a station (composer Brian Lawlor’s sprawling sonic environment includes keyboards, rhythms, distorted speech). “I dream impossible things,” Wevers says, as Andrew Bartee flies, lifted by hands, across the stage.

You hear Wevers discourse about his choreography, where it comes from, what his interests are, and the choreography often comments on that. When he says he doesn’t want black, he wants purple, it draws attention to the dancers wearing nothing but black. When he says “graceful” the dancers wobble; when he says “seamless” they come up short in sequence, bobbling. The audience laughs out loud at a line dance that acts out verbal-filler tics (Wevers told me it came from listening to himself “um” and “ya know” through interview tapes) — the dancers all rub their chins reflectively.

The heart of the work is a duet between Bartee and Peil, illustrating a couple whose personal space looks like Swiss cheese, with secret tunnels from one to the other. Some of Wevers’ most original work comes in his pas de deux, and the movement idiom his couples seem to have invented, like a secret language. Here you see a lightness and heaviness, a body dragged dead-weight on the floor by its arm, then something tightens, and everything lifts. Outstretched hands meet and curl around foreheads, necks. Peil and Bartee run through dance prepositions: above, beside, below, upon, sliding through another’s arch, arms reaching as if to tie themselves together. Peil has gained that ability to be the step, as if it’s a thought she’s having, and Bartee thrives on that spontaneity.

In the shadows dances another Wevers preoccupation, the “monster”: a swarming of the dancers (Bartee, Peil, Mia Monteabaro, Lara Seefeldt, Sergey Kheylik) their arms interlocking, entangling, one of them struggling to break free with a mimed shout, then pulled back in. After, Monteabaro has a solo in front of a barred light that casts a huge black shadow. As Wevers discusses his own insecurity, Bartee performs a Robbins-esque “anixiety” solo behind a scrim, shoulders hunched, fingers clawed, at one point he’s bent over backwards. It’s like if you make cheeseburgers and people like them, narrates Wevers, tragicomically, now you’ve got to make a lot more cheeseburgers.

Bartee has his own work in the show, This Is Real, about “tension between friends” and set to music by Lena Simon. He’s expanded it from a shorter work, to let various combinations play out. Initially, Peil and Monteabaro are dancing in perfect synchronicity — you’re just watching a stream of ideas unfold, arm gestures and backward steps — and then Sergey Kheylik enters and the mood goes south. Kheylik is a compact, curly-haired fellow with slightly insolent posture, and you see Peil size him up and decide to bite. Monteabaro is having none of it, slapping Kheylik’s chest and pushing Peil down. When Kheylik doesn’t back off, she jumps him. Things never get that volatile again, but every time Kheylik reappears, Peil and Monteabaro having found their rhythm, there’s a frisson that runs across the stage.

Lara Seefeldt and  Jesse Sani make a feast of a remounting of Fragments, Wevers’ 2007 prize-winning work that employs Mozart arias to make elbow-room for dance that is a bit more full-throated. Seefeldt and Sani are wearing deconstructed corset-and-gown numbers by Christine Joly de Lotbiniere, Seefeldt every inch the Mozart ingenue. They can dance prettily, as befits Mozart, but you’ll also see them bend over backward with a scream’s rictus on their faces, or seated, they beat their feet in tiny pas in a widening arc, evoking a coloratura run. Sani’s solo, in which he steps out of his dress, and begins an exercise in uncorseted, slow articulations, is a show-stopper.

Whim W’Him’s Back with Flowers & Shadows for a Weekend Run

Whim W’Him, the modern dance company led by Olivier Wevers, opened their show Third Degree last night (at Intiman Playhouse tonight, 8 p.m., and Sunday, 7 p.m.; tickets), with a typically generous program from Wevers that includes “This Is Real,” choreographed by dancer Andrew Bartee, and “L’Effleuré” by Annabelle Lopez Ochoa, as well as Wevers’ “I Don’t Remember A Spark” and a reprise of “FRAGMENTS.”

If you need just one reason to go, Michael Upchurch writes in the Seattle Times, Bartee is it:

Set to a Vivaldi score, “L’Effleuré” opens with Bartee in gleaming half-silhouette (the title, as the program explains, is a play on the French words for “flower” and “one who has been gently touched, caressed”). The variety, control and detail of his actions, as he unspools himself in response to the music, are truly mesmerizing. There’s a latent violence in his eddying elegance, too, that lends the piece a stinging edge.

Lopez Ochoa created the work, which had its premiere in 2010, for Rubinald Pronk; in the rehearsal I saw a seemingly small touch — Bartee had roses for palms and mouth — came to feel surreal in the good, transgressive way.

“I Don’t Remember A Spark” features some newer faces for the company (Lara Seefeldt, Mia Monteabaro, Sergey Kheylik), and though it’s often light-hearted, it includes an intense pas de deux between Tory Peil (who, to continue the floral theme, seems really to be blossoming in Wevers company) and Bartee. Composer Brian Lawlor has turned a Wevers “interview” into a kind of tone poem, contrasting with and accentuated by the “stark and dark and black-and-white” lighting that Wevers asked of designer Michael Mazzola.

Trio of New Works at PNB Yields Clear Audience Favorite

AMillionKissestomySkin.Dec-Rausch.3 0120.AS
PNBRep3 0853
PNBRep3 0266
PNBRep3 0970
PNBRep3 1299

Pacific Northwest Ballet soloist Lindsi Dec (front) and principal dancer Lesley Rausch in David Dawson’s A Million Kisses to my Skin. (Photo: © Angela Sterling)

Pacific Northwest Ballet company dancers in Annabelle Lopez Ochoa’s Cylindrical Shadows. (Photo © Angela Sterling)

Pacific Northwest Ballet principal dancer Lucien Postlewaite and soloist Lindsi Dec in David Dawson’s A Million Kisses to my Skin. (Photo © Angela Sterling)

Pacific Northwest Ballet principal dancers Kaori Nakamura (front) and Lucien Postlewaite in Annabelle Lopez Ochoa’s Cylindrical Shadows. (Photo: © Angela Sterling)

Pacific Northwest Ballet principal dancer Rachel Foster (center) and company dancers in Victor Quijada’s Mating Theory. (Photo © Angela Sterling)

PNBRep3 0853 thumbnail

PNB’s New Works programs, under Peter Boal, don’t always create storms of applause–though this one did on Saturday night–but they represent the company’s most direct attempts to help audiences encounter ballet as a living art form: taking risks, exploring alternative paths, giving new choreographers a chance at the spotlight. This time around, New Works (through March 24 at McCaw Hall) presents Annabelle Lopez Ochoa, Victor Quijada, and David Dawson–though the specter of William Forsythe is also present.

For one, you can see some of Forsythe’s influence on Dawson, and for two, the people back of me were discussing how they almost dropped their ballet subscription on account of “One Flat Thing, Reproduced,” which is a story they’ve been telling since 2008. Think of it: four years later, and they can still discuss the work in detail. It’s almost as if it had some kind of lasting impact on them, rather than simply being pretty, or likeable.

I don’t often quibble with Pacific Northwest Ballet’s capo di tutti ballerine, Peter Boal, but I couldn’t shake the feeling that David Dawson‘s “A Million Kisses to my Skin” makes a better closer than curtain-raiser. Dawson’s work is getting glitter-bombed with critical superlatives (“loose-limbed, breezy joy,” Moira McDonald, Seattle Times; “tip-toe, twirling chaînés, pirouettes and piqués galore,” Crosscut’s Alice Kaderlan) and deservedly so, but it’s a difficult act to follow.

For this review, I get to arrange the works, so let’s begin with the world premiere of Quijada’s “Mating Theory,” with music by Jasper Gahunia. While I don’t think this work is that successful, ultimately, you can see flashes of what may come. What I remember are striking tableaux: the way, for instance, it opens with two dancers silhouetted against a wash of orange backdrop, but also side-lit (by Yan Lee Chan) so that they gain the contrasty dimensionality of a comic book. They reach out to bridge a distance, but miss. It’s repeated again, later on, the missing, grabbing an outstretched foot–it’s not enough to hold onto. But there are also male and female ensembles who face off in anticipation of…well, not much, actually. The body language–feral, upper-body retreats and snakings forward, martial artsy presentation–suggests more than it delivers. A man dances with the women, a woman with the men. The PNB dancers are game (especially the women), but maybe they, too, are struggling with what it all, meandering, means because they never seem to fully inhabit the movements so that they cohere.

Ochoa’s Cylindrical Shadows, in an expanded form from its Whim W’Him days, rewards repeated viewing. It’s subversively, not aggressively, innovative in how it tackles mortality and the sometimes sudden vanishings of life. People, after all, don’t want to deal with death unless they have to, let alone face the thought of how randomly the string can be cut. Ochoa has found what I always feel is a sharply poignant illustration of contemplative solitude–a dancer sitting on the hip of another, stretched out on his side–but there’s an almost Freudian wealth of symbolism in her piece as well. Arms go limp, then swing, like perhaps a pendulum’s hands. An ensemble loses a member; is that dancer sleeping or dead? Stiff arms and legs form a kind of fence that a dancer pokes his head through. And then there’s that lyrical duet (Postlewaite, Nakamura), to remind you that it’s not just men who are willing to venture to the underworld out of love. When you see Postlewaite dip to catch up Nakamura, it’s as if she’s silk in the breeze, draping him; you don’t soon forget that image.

Finally, then, we come to “A Million Kisses,” and a bravura, how-long-can-this-go-on display of technique. Dawson’s work is overwhelming in that sense–it’s poetic compression applied to movement vocabulary, and played at 45 rpm. The dancers seem to flicker in your eyes during the allegro sections. Lucien Postlewaite and Jonathan Porretta bound like stags, but in the middle, slower section, Seth Orza extracts poetry from a lowered sweep of arm, as if he’d turned the air to honey and simply relaxed. “Arms and legs are hyper-extended by both men and women, and asymmetry, off-center turns, broken lines, swoops, dips, and swirls are passed on from dancer to dancer as though they are sharing the sheer joy of movement,” explain the program notes, and this, I think, also explains something of the exhilaration of the work for ballet fans, this exuberant coloring outside the lines that means nothing quite happens when and where you, from habit, expect it: Lifts are over-rotated, so the women are frozen in plunges, not in flight. Instead of being assisted in slides, they’re almost tossed like a shovelful of ballerina into free-fall, and what happens next feels anyone’s guess. I’m not the only one to have been open-mouthed at Maria Chapman’s exhibition of how this is really done.