Tag Archives: Maureen Whiting

Three New Works Invite Repeated Viewing at Velocity’s SCUBA 2013

Green Chair Dance Group‘s Tandem Biking and Other Dangerous Pastimes for Two ends the SCUBA 2013 program at Velocity Dance Center (through April 28; tickets) but as they are visitors to Seattle, let’s talk about them first. That way we can get right into how they quirkily talk the audience through an “inside look” at a three-person dance troupe and their interpersonal dynamics.

That the explanations are often unclear, gnomic, or non sequiturs takes nothing from the earnest helpfulness with which they share the names of various pieces (“We Are Reasonable People,” “We Are Luscious People,” “We Are Desperate People”), announce the rationale for their order (the favorite one comes first), or instruct the audience that the games they’ll be playing, however, are “real” (immediately undercut by Sarah Gladwin Camp letting everyone in on the fact that de Keijzer’s game is wearing natural fabrics: cotton, organic cotton; while she, Gladwin Camp likes to play “Don’t Touch My Face,” a game inspired by the fact that she doesn’t like water or people touching her face, and which is indicated by her making a shuffling gesture of disdain with her hands and fingers).

Early on, Gregory Holt gets so carried away with his narration that he mansplains another dancer out of existence, dropping to the floor to show everyone what her dance is like. Dance is decentralized here — or, looked at another way, made so diffuse it permeates everything. Though the work begins with a polished, in-unison phrase that they bring back (seasonally, in swim wear and snow gear) — kicking prettily from a beach-blanket pose, jacking through a turn on their backs by swiveling their hips, hopping to their feet for some stepping — there are also extended, aggressive capoeira-esque bouts, “monument” building where bodies are placed on or jointed into other bodies, and de Keijzer’s contorted face and tongue “dance.”

Gladwin Camp mentions, of a Holt-de Keijzer duet, that it was, for her, like looking through the wrong end of a pair of binoculars. The tension inherent in Tandem Biking for a three-person group gives it both cohesive and propulsive force. De Keijzer says that she’s pretty sure they could all three handle being cooped up in one small room for years, so long as, on a rotating basis, one could leave to have some time alone. The flip-side of that is when one watches as the other two perform. Gladwin Camp emerges bundled up like the kid from A Christmas Story, and it’s both a metaphor for a sort of bruised tenderness, and not a metaphor at all, but a wintertime reality.

Maureen Whiting‘s About That Tree, with its painted-face dancers in tunics and pelts, seemingly living among or caught by the battered branches of a fallen tree, swiftly generates an atmosphere that, this particular year, might remind you of Rite of Spring‘s mythic primitivism. There’s not a lot of spring to be seen, though — the tree has fallen, and a bag of dusty, dead leaves is emptied onto the stage (costume and visual design are by Danii Blackwell and Jean Hicks). Music by Dave Abramson, Eyvind Kang, and Evan Schiller, in vastly different idioms, fits perfectly with the choreography for a 14-person ensemble.

When I saw an excerpt in rehearsal, Whiting was still determining if the “center would hold,” in terms of there being a focal point for the audience — 14 dancers is a lot to attend to. But she’s pulled it off without resorting to strict unison movement that might dampen the individuality expressed by her dancers. She uses breathing, and the sound of it, to move your attention; competing rhythms arise and generate a sort of group “breath” — or not. At one point, a dancer grabs the tree and holds a chunk aloft, another begins a solo with a sort of switch, another balances small branches on her shoulders, head, in the small of her back. The piece ends with a dancer, having grabbed the tree for herself, dropping it to let its clatter disrupt the breathy group communion.

This world premiere is a work you may want to see — and hear — a few times. There’s a poetic compression to it that leaves you wanting more.

Shannon Stewart’s An Inner Place That Has No Place (Photo: Tim Summers)

I had a similar feeling about the excerpt from Shannon Stewart‘s An Inner Place That Has No Place, which I saw an earlier version of a year ago. Here, what had been the last segment came first — dancers Meredith Horiuchi, Mary Margaret Moore, Aaron Swartzman, Rosa Vissers, and David Wolbrecht start off with a high-energy routine, complete with whoops of theoretic delight, that evokes a workout class’s slightly manic pace (music is by composer Jeff Huston).

Initially, the movements are both mechanically precise and slightly cliché, Broadway-musical-style, but then the dancers start shouting out icebreaker-style questions to each other about their pasts that get a litte intrusive (“Where did you lose your virginity?”) and as answers are given, the strict cohesion falters and they start interacting with each other with more idiosyncratic movement. But later, they’ll group around a single dancer and barrage him or her with questions, bumping up against, until the person seems to pass out, so it seems that perhaps moderation is key.

Behind the troupe, a striking video projection (courtesy filmmaker Adam Sekuler) shows them repeating into infinity — this later changes into an expanse of night sky that feels both beautiful and ominous, with a single dancer left. In a middle segment, the troupe poses for a series of memory-photographs, in ways that are both satirically funny (they look to be drunken party shots) and increasingly eerie, as the dancers’ expressions freeze into rictuses or slowly melt away. Even in excerpted form, the work packs a punch that you’re never quite ready for, as its set-ups veer off down unanticipated alleys.

ACT’s Ramayana is a Most Epic of Epics

ACT- Rama and Sita
ACT-Ramayana 052
Ramayana for ACT Theatre by LaRae Lobdell of PhotoSister.com

Rafael Untalan as Rama, Khanh Doan as Sita in ACT's production of Ramayana (Photo: Chris Bennion)

Cast of Ramayana performing the Wedding Dance (Photo: Chris Bennion)

Brandon O'Neill as Hanuman in ACT's production of Ramayana (Photo: LaRae Lobdell)

ACT- Rama and Sita thumbnail
ACT-Ramayana 052 thumbnail
Ramayana for ACT Theatre by LaRae Lobdell of PhotoSister.com thumbnail

The word epic gets tossed around a good deal and not only by theatre theorists interested in Bertolt Brecht but also by young people who find the word “awesome” insufficiently demonstrative. The Ramayana is one of the stories for which the word was fashioned. ACT’s current production (here given the Indian pronunciation: rom-EYE-ah-nah) lives up to the billing with a lightning-fast, three-hour production that leaves us joyful, contemplative, and newly in love with theatre (at ACT through Nov. 11; tickets).

Ramayana is akin to the Iliad in that it is a collection of stories surrounding the abduction of a princess, Sita (Khanh Doan), and the efforts of her husband, Rama (Rafael Untalan), to free her from the demon, Ravana (John Farrage). Within that story are didactic and engaging tales of royal succession, divine intervention, romance, rivalry, jealousy, duty, justice, and more. It touches on nearly every facet of life. With this level of ambition the nearly-three-hour running time feels minimal but the abridgements are handled deftly. Often a few, generally wry, words suggest what is undoubtedly a lengthy litany in the original text.

If there is a flaw in this production it is that actors are sometimes lost from view on the floor. The problem is the mark of a very fully enacted and absorbing production. Physical actions reach up atop a second story and often collapse in prostration but unless the prone actor is at least as far upstage as center we lose sight of him in the silhouettes of those in front of us—this coming from someone who is well over six feet tall.

In a lesser production this would be a minor quibble (who worries about missing a bit of action?) but there is nothing extraneous in Ramayana, every prop and gesture incites our interest. When Ray Tagavilla as Rama’s brother, Bharata, bows before him, he also removes Rama’s shoes and places them on a throne as a symbol of the servitude of his regency. Missing that bit of action can create a hole in a narrative that—rich as it is—can be nearly as spare as CliffsNotes given the eventful plot.

The genius of this production finds its emblem in the portrayal of Jatayu, the eagle, who attempts to rescue Sita as Ravana abducts her. Jatayu enters as the shadow of a simple rod puppet (designed by Greg Carter). The puppet is cardboard-thin and elaborately painted and perforated as in wayang kulit, the traditional Indonesian shadow puppetry form in which the Ramayana is often performed.

After crossing the scene this depiction graduates from a direct reference to a new evocation. Jatayu returns in the form of a woman with a gauze shawl, shadowed by gauze draped over three poles that suggest a bird’s body with wings. This gives us a simple and modern depiction of the enormous physical bird and its very human emotional conditions. Similarly the adaptation as a whole both references the traditions of the Ramayana and updates the visual and fabulistic elements to serve ACT’s audience with both the colloquial and the spiritual, low and high arts. All told it is a transcendent achievement.

Despite the story’s vast scale physically, philosophically, and emotionally, the production easily sells us on emotions that could seem laughable to American audiences. Tagavilla is brilliantly cast in his most prominent role as Bharata, who unwillingly winds up serving as regent during Rama’s exile. He makes the immensity of Bharata’s torment at his impossible position both palpable and natural.

Farrage has a similar achievement. Though, as Ravana, he sustains an aggravated voice for most of the show he largely avoids seeming cartoonishly villainous. Anne Allgood’s entrance as Ravana’s sister, Soorpanaka, has all that cartoonish villainy, yet laughing at her tragic obsessiveness frees the audience to feel a childlike delight. That we gasp in horror at her subsequent treatment returns our equilibrium and keeps the show grounded.

Soorpanaka’s disfigurement is not the only time the audience audibly gasps at the simple magic onstage. Sita and Rama disappear, a giant destroys battalions before Rama’s arrows lay him down, characters are consumed in fire, and all of it furloughs our disbelief. Matthew Smucker’s sets and Brendan Patrick Hogan’s sound design elevate simplicity into enchantment by engaging our imagination. The set mostly consists of bamboo and gauze. The sound design often both cues from and reinforces live instruments and voices, expanding the scale of the tangible.

But rather than laud the contributions to this production with an epic of criticism, let it suffice to say that from the adept adaptation to Hanuman’s hijinks, ACT’s Ramayana is a tremendous success and worth repeated attendance.