Tag Archives: paul budraitis

From “Master Harold” to “Mud,” Small Shows Deliver Big

G. Valmont Thomas as Sam and James Lindsay as Hally in Master Harold...and the boys at West of Lenin (Photo: John Ulman)
G. Valmont Thomas as Sam and James Lindsay as Hally in Master Harold…and the boys at West of Lenin (Photo: John Ulman)

The phenomenal production of Master Harold…and the boys at West of Lenin (through April 21; tickets) has all the trappings of a work from a much larger theatre. Catherine Cornell’s realist set, a recreation of the St. George’s Park Tea Room in Port Elizabeth, boasts worn, scarred linoleum, cookies under glass domes, a vintage jukebox, rotary wall phone. A sign in the hallway carries directions to the tea room, and to a pool. Producer AJ Epstein is responsible for many of the other elements that transport you into the moment: sounds of afternoon rainfall, the racheting of a phone being dialed.

As your eye rests on the linoleum you notice a faint, backwards “St. George’s Park Tea Room” in shadow, as if cast by light through a window. And then Kevin Warren (who’s popped up on Grimm on your TV) emerges, followed by G. Valmont Thomas (a name familiar both here and in Ashland) — they are Willie and Sam, the two black South Africans who work at the tea room. It’s 1950 and a long way from apartheid’s end.

Athol Fugard’s play was seemingly everywhere after its 1982 premiere, first as a challenge to apartheid, then as its obituary. To see it now is to be struck by how unerring Fugard is in finding the personal in racism’s sustenance (bitterness, shame, striving). Apartheid boycotts are not in the headlines, but South Africa is still peopled by those wounded by the shorthand of skin color for social class.

Fugard’s great pivot was, with Sam, to illustrate reverse compassion. We quickly see he’s a stand-in father for his nominal “boss” Hally (James Lindsay), who’s minding the tea room while his mother is at the hospital. Hally has long been Sam’s charge, and the course of the play is a retracing of that intertwined history — from Hally’s reminiscences gilded with casual, patronizing racism (and Sam’s teasing recollections of how Hally was forever underfoot) to Hally’s vicious attempts, as he loses his own footing, to remind Sam of “his place.”

Kevin Warren as Willie and G. Valmont Thomas as Sam in Master Harold...and the boys at West of Lenin (Photo: John Ulman)
Kevin Warren as Willie and G. Valmont Thomas as Sam in Master Harold…and the boys at West of Lenin (Photo: John Ulman)

All three are thoroughly coached in how to sound South African (Judith Shahn’s vocal work). Lindsay, in his schoolboy’s blazer (Anastasia Armes’ costumes are pitch-perfect), has the beleaguered look — and outlook — of an older man, who feels the world conspiring against his security. Brashly collegiate and lordly at the outset, complimenting himself on “educating” Sam time and again, he spirals into a rage that threatens to consume him.

Unseen is a homemade kite Sam and Hally once flew. It tugged at the end of the string, remembers Hally, like something alive that wanted to get free. It’s a resonant image, in the context of apartheid, but it applies to Hally as well, who would like to leave his younger self far behind.

Rage is also Willie’s problem — Kevin Warren bubbles over with fury at his absent dance partner (absent because beaten, as Sam points out). A dance competition becomes, in Fugard’s hands, a wicked analogy of perspectives on Western and “primitive” art and culture, as well as a metaphor on the ideal of shared political space in which everyone has been practicing their steps.

It’s also a way of delineating the way cultures can be blind to each other’s most precious dreams — Sam wants to know if a dancer gets demerits for tripping, which astonishes Sam and Willie as something unthinkable. These are finalists; they will be perfect. Sam coaches Willie on the quick-step (Warren with tense, seized-up joints initially, shoulders hoisted), and gradually he improves. (Actual dance coach Tina LaPadula can feel justifiably proud of their graceful twosome at the play’s close.)

Under the direction of M. Burke Walker, the trio of actors substantiate their shared history with an visible familiarity that’s hard come by on the stage. Walker knows he’s building to an explosion, so nothing rushes past; the pace is determined by the work being done (or ignored), stories being told, secrets revealed. It’s captivating.

(MUD poster designed by Josh Taylor)
(Poster: Josh Taylor)

Mud, by Cuban-American playwright Maria Irene Fornés, came and went with great intensity last weekend. The New Yorker, while noting her tendency to set up shop at the intersection of poverty and feminism, said also that “her work sits in the ear like luxurious reason.” In Mud, characters Mae and Lloyd chant a plainsong of miscommunication, as Mae seeks to educate herself. Maybe the repetition is simply because they know the other isn’t hearing them, or maybe they still hope that a change in intonation will help them break through.

A senior project from Cornish students Skylar Tatro (who plays Mae) and John Pyburn (Lloyd), it was understandably austere. Paul Budraitis, who also directed, provided the set and lighting design, which for the most part consisted of a table and chairs, lit by a single overhead bulb. The costume design by Adam Hulse seemed to aim for a raggedly Appalachian feel.

As the play opened, Mae stood off to the side, ironing, while arguing with Lloyd over her schooling and their sex life. Lloyd, it transpired, was impotent as a result of an infection. But of course he couldn’t admit that — trying to shame and blame Mae, he told her he’d gotten it up with one of their pigs recently. Mae was unimpressed. She was more taken with the older Henry (Lantz Wagner, not looking a gift horse in the mouth), booting Lloyd out, and moving Henry in. Lloyd, like a kind of camp-robbing bird, skulked around thereafter.

It’s a difficult but rewarding play for young actors. What’s it like to be illiterate, for instance? Pyburn, rangy, resentful, restless, seemed to fade out of focus when it came to maintaining particularities of his character while Henry and Mae mooned over each other. Tatro’s Mae, sounding lightly down-home, seemed to find more to say in Fornés’ variations, and she’s adept at using her face as a mask — her forehead furrows, her eyes glisten, her lips tauten.

Budraitis, after showing us the table for most of the play’s hour-long running time, had one more directorial jab in store. Downstage, lit only briefly in flashes, were two rectangular planter-like enclosures, one filled with round rocks, another with dark earth. Henry would slip on the rocks, in a spasmodic, high-kneed choreography that seemed to catch him in just that moment of in-betweenness; and Mae would fall into that dirt, her blood turning it muddy.

Inside Sam Shepard’s Bruised Mind, and a Salesman, Unearthed

LOTM joe.aimee.tim

Ray Tagavilla (Jake) and Maggie Tatone (Sally) in Shepard's A Lie of the Mind (Photo: Jenessa West)

Tim Gouran (Frankie) and Macall Gordon (Lorraine, standing) with Ray Tagavilla (Jake, couch) and Maggie Tatone (Sally, kneeling) in Shepard's A Lie of the Mind (Photo: Jenessa West)

Joe Ivy (Baylor), Aimée Bruneau (Beth), and Tim Gouran (Frankie) in Shepard's A Lie of the Mind (Photo: Jenessa West)

Midway through its run, A Lie of the Mind (through October 1; tickets: $25) brought an standing-room-only crowd to ACT Theatre’s Bullitt Cabaret to see the new collective Collektor‘s take on Sam Shepard’s 1985 play. (ACT, with its Central Heating Lab and ACT Pass, can be officially said to be the home of Seattle’s young theatre scene.)

Pruned from four to three hours (with two intermissions), Lie of the Mind is an unlikely recent revival–it opens frantically, with a husband having beaten his wife into brain damage, but otherwise spends much of its time alternating between couch and bed, as characters try to discover what’s to be done. In the hands of director Rob West, there’s never a dull moment–his cast follows motivations through scenes like a pack on the scent of prey.

Probably of economic necessity, designer Etta Lilienthal keeps the set minimal (homely couches, beds, chairs), but it’s also all that’s needed, as Evan Ritter’s shifty lighting and Sean Patrick Taylor’s lonesome, plucked guitar aid a phenomenal cast in stepping in to carry you off with them to southern California and Montana, where two families absorb the punishing after-effects of Jake’s homicidal outburst.

Though Jake’s brutalization of Beth provides the inciting incident (Jodie Knowles’ make-up provides a wince-worthy tapestry of bruising, slow to heal throughout the night), the play widens its focus again and again, first to other family members coping with Jake (Ray Tagavilla) and Beth (Aimée Bruneau), then to their lives, then to the traumas they’ve endured.

It’s a phenomenology of family–how we are made up by family, yet never wholly seen by them. Shepard keeps you guessing at whether Frankie and Jake are two sides of the same person, at least symbolically, as children of an alcoholic, but it doesn’t come to much either way. It’s these associations in Shepard’s mind, fleeting thoughts made explicit, that are the reality. The play frames–and heightens–the uncertainty of what we can know.

Shepard’s families may remind you of how little smart young playwrights are interested in that mundane messiness. So often, people in plays are exactly the sort of people who should be in plays: They are witty or dramatically tortured or great to look at. Shepard’s people balk at all that. His parents are your parents–or at least the parents of people you know. (Jennessa West’s regionally specific costumes underscore the lived-in lives of these people.)

Jake (the awesomely-voiced Tagavilla), it turns out, more than balks at theatre. To him, it’s a lie–and people lie because they want to put something over on you. Shepard pursues Jake into his misogynistic, schizophrenic freak-out, when everything–including family–turns false and scheming, but also observes how his family both blankets and strait-jackets him.

His brother Frankie (Tim Gouran) doesn’t trust Ray to be telling the truth about having beaten Beth to death, and heads off to her family’s home in Montana, a mule ranch run by the crusty patriarch Baylor (Joe Ivy), whose wife Meg (Sally Brady) has become his caretaker in later life, the person to pull off Baylor’s boots and rub mink oil into his cold-cracked feet.

Late in the play, Lorraine’s daughter Sally (Maggie Tatone) diffidently sits down with her mom, looking through old photos, and Lorraine (Macall Gordon) reminisces about the parades she and her horse rode in–a bygone southern California springs to country-fair life–and then Lorraine tells Sally to burn the photograph.

It may or may not mean much–it’s just the way Lorraine is. But you are far, far away, you realize, from Jake beating Beth to a pulp, and how is that? Only Beth’s brother Mike (Eric Riedmann) seems to be able to stay on task, though no one has much use for his attempts to set things right. Shepard isn’t exactly clear on this: You probably can’t set brain damage “right,” but it also seems as though the families have, in taking responsibility for blood, diffused the original wrong. Hunting seems to be one way to find peace, especially if you shoot someone accidentally.

Life goes on.

Sometimes life goes on, even when you don’t expect it to. At West of Lenin last weekend, director Paul Budraitis gave a workshop presentation of his surreal take on the afterlife of Willy Loman, The Salesman is Dead. Long Live the Salesman! I won’t review it here, since it’s in workshop, but it’s already something you may want to keep your eyes peeled for. James Cowan is terrific as the ex-Willy, but although it’s a solo show, he has co-stars in the Splinter Group, the creative team (Montana Tippett, Heidi Hunt, Joshua Tillman) that drapes him in dust and shadow, water and light. Seattlest calls it a tone poem, which is exactly right: Once life is extinguished, there’s not much drama left (though Cowan’s discoveries in his new state of being can be searing). There is confusion, there are memories, perhaps longing. You’re left impressed by what, in this almost wordless play (except for piped-in recordings), would be background to dialogue elsewhere: Cowan’s adrenalin shivers as he grips the steering wheel, his Jack Benny reverie from a long-ago sales trip, the transparent house that, like a crystal in an old radio set, tunes in his lost family, unsteadily. “A MAN IS NOT A PIECE OF FRUIT!” rings out, and you have the terrible suspicion that Loman really is back.

Solo Performance Fest #5 Kicks Off at Theatre Off Jackson

The always amazing Terri Weagant, one of the artists in this year's SPF at ToJ.

Every person in the theater has a few formative moments, I think, those performances that in their sheer surprising and moving power made us become who we are, got us addicted to this ever-dying, ever-disappointing, anachronistic beast of an art form. The reason we stick with theater is precisely because of those moments–it’s like an addiction.

For me, one of the three or four performances that sticks out in my mind took place in 1997 or ’98, in a tiny little community theatre in Hillsboro, Ore. A friend of mine was a member of the company, Hillsboro Artists Repertory Theatre, and it was their fundraiser evening, a mixed showcase of mainly musical numbers ranging from a sassy take on How to Succeed in Business from the clearly gay but possibly not-yet-out kid, to a few ballads, to…you know, the typical mix of heartfelt tripe.

And then came the closer. I’d been told in advance that he was a character: an older retired man who’d been something on Broadway in his day (which I assume means no one), who’d been very generous to the company (probably a few hundred dollar donation), and was tolerated as the colorful character who was ever so slightly gauche with the teenage ladies. So he was invited to close out the revue, but when he came on, instead of launching in to a number, he just…talked. Told a story. Sang a few songs. And it was one of the most captivating things I’ve ever seen.

I still remember the set-up to the last number. It was, he explained, a song from a nearly forgotten Broadway musical of an earlier age, in which an older man and a younger man both fell in love with a young woman, who of course wound up with the more appropriate younger man. But here’s the trick: the song he was about to sing was the old man’s lament, and when, during previews (Catskills?) the woman went for the young man, the audience started booing. So the show closed, the ending was scrapped and rewritten, an lo and behold, now the young woman went for the older man.

I have no idea what musical it’s from, and the melody and lyrics have long since vanished from my memory. Hell, the story’s too neat and clean to be true. But I still remember him telling it. It was one of the single finest demonstrations of the most basic and profound power the theater has: a person, in front of an audience, keeping them rapt and leaving them ultimately profoundly moved by just telling a story.

That’s one of the reasons that, despite my countless misgivings, I am and will remain a big supporter of solo performance. In the theater world, solo performance is more often than not a bastardized catch-all: a creative outlet for bored actors who fall back on monologue cliches, or worse, a weirdly commercially viable form of theater. I know more than one artist who relies on a salable solo show to make half a year’s living working the North American or European fringe fest circuit.

But there are definitely some solo performances that defy the term. One of the best pieces of theatre to come out of Seattle in years was Keith Hitchcock’s Muffin Face, a solo show that doesn’t feel like one. Nor does whatever the hell it is Mike Pham did onstage at the last NW New Works in I Love You I Hate You. And then there are the Charles Smiths or Paul Budraitises or Jose Amadors of the world, and yeah, even cynical, seen-it-all me has to admit, solo performance is a powerful and vibrant form

Tonight marks the opening of the fifth installment of Solo Performance Festival down at Theatre off Jackson, which runs through May 7. The festival is a little sparser than last year, but the programming is tighter. It kicks off tonight with the inimitable Lauren Weedman, an LA-by-way-of-Seattle performer, in No…You Shut Up!, which explores adoption. (Don’t let that touchy-feely description fool you–Weedman’s amazing.)

Local fave Terri Weagant (who not so long ago owned a production of the solo show to end ’em all, The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe) presents a original piece, Karaoke Suicide is Painless, “a multimedia karaoke comedy that explores the correlation between air guitar and personal choice.” Up-and-comer Jerick Hofer tries to step up Seattle’s take on queer solo performance (a form that always gestates in Seattle but in NYC is amazingly fertile) in Turning Parlor Tricks. And long-time Seattle theatre mainstay Bret Fetzer directs Matt Smith in All My Children.

The “Best in Shorts” evenings are always a mixed bag, to be honest, but are worth it for the truly dedicated because that’s the sort of format you’re going to see something amazing in, the type of 10-minute performance that three years later might blow your mind at On the Boards. And this year, a new tidbit has been added with “Voir Dire,” a mixed evening of storytelling from Seattle writers and performers, which continues to expand the base.

We’re going to be covering the festival throughout, so more information will come in the near future. That said, I caught most of the festival last year and was amazed at how often truly amazing little shows played to small audiences. I always worry that saying something like that will throw up red-flags, but I just want to be honest: this is the sort of thing that people shouldn’t miss. Theatre people who care about the form obviously need to be there. But non-theatre people who have little patience for tedious “acting” in big shows will be be surprised–most of these artists are here because they’re tired of traditional theatre productions, too. If the Rep and ACT and Intiman are the NBA, then SPF is March Madness: balls-to-the-wall, one chance only so bring your A-game theatre. Tickets are a steal at under $20 a show, and beer’s cheap on-site.