Tag Archives: speed limit

News, Transportation

Legislature Taking Another Look at Safer, Slower Speeds on City Streets

If you lived here, you could have a car in your living room by now. This 24th Ave E & Montlake Blvd apartment's guard rail is put to heavy use each year. (Photo: MvB)
This 24th Ave E & Montlake Blvd apartment’s guard rail is put to heavy use each year. Unluckily for them, it’s an arterial, so slowing traffic would require costly engineering and traffic studies. (Photo: MvB)

The Neighborhood Safe Streets bill is back, says KIRO Radio’s Kim Shepard, saying there’s a “big push” to get it voted on this legislative session. The bill would allow municipalities across the state to lower speed limits on city roads to as slow as 20 mph without commissioning engineering and traffic studies (whose costs rise with the number of intersections involved). As the bill’s title indicates, the focus is on neighborhood pedestrian safety.

The bill applies specifically to nonarterial streets in residential or business districts, so the change in most cases would be just five miles per hour, to 20 from 25 mph. What’s the big deal? Here’s our earlier explanation:

It seems picayune. What difference could five miles per hour make? It turns out to be life-and-death, because the relationship of fatalities to speed is not linear.

Someone hit by a car traveling at 40 miles per hour has an over-80-percent chance of being killed. At 30, it’s still 37 to 45 percent. But at 20, it’s just five percent. The key factors are stopping time and response time–at 20 miles per hour, the driver is in control of their car, and can stop before hitting someone. As you increase speed, you have less time to respond, while stopping distance increases.

If a municipality wants to lower the speed limit on a stretch of state road, they’ll have to petition the state secretary of transportation. Studies will still be required for any increase in an existing speed limit, except that any newly lowered limit can be returned to its original state within one year.

It may seem like common sense to allow towns and cities this decision, but the bill got nowhere last session. This session, SB 5066 is being sponsored by Senators Billig, Litzow, Eide, Frockt, Rolfes and HB 1045, by Representatives Ryu, Angel, Moscoso, Clibborn, Upthegrove, Fitzgibbon  Liias, Pedersen, Stanford, Farrell, Morrell, Pollet, Bergquist, Fey. Shepard says the House Committee on Transportation is giving the proposed legislation its first hearing this afternoon.

News, Politics, Transportation

The War on Running People Down in the Street

3 Comments
If you lived here, you could have a car in your living room by now. This 24th Ave E & Montlake Blvd apartment's guard rail is put to heavy use each year. (Photo: MvB)

UPDATE: Thanks to Andrew Sullivan and Sightline for the links.

It’s a sad fact that you have to get out of your car, occasionally, and at those times you’re vulnerable if you’re anywhere near a street. Short of only patronizing drive-thrus, and making sure your home comes with a garage, there’s one sure way of bettering your odds of living peacefully with cars.

That’s slowing down the car before it hits you.

In “The War On Kids, the Elderly, and Other People Who Walk,” Sightline’s Eric de Place is writing about a bill before Washington legislature, which would allow cities to set 20-mph speed limits on their residential streets, without paying for an engineering and traffic study first. It seems picayune. What difference could five miles per hour make? It turns out to be life-and-death, because the relationship of fatalities to speed is not linear.

Someone hit by a car traveling at 40 miles per hour has an over-80-percent chance of being killed. At 30, it’s still 37 to 45 percent. But at 20, it’s just five percent. The key factors are stopping time and response time–at 20 miles per hour, the driver is in control of their car, and can stop before hitting someone. As you increase speed, you have less time to respond, while stopping distance increases.

There are apparently people for whom a five mile-per-hour difference is a bridge too far. Their time is far too valuable (despite their predilection for traveling long distances on residential streets) and in their cost-benefit ratio, the cost of a few lives is worth it. I don’t know how else to put it.

When you peruse the Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2010 Traffic Report, you learn that 529 pedestrians were hit by people in cars last year. Over 8,000 times, drivers hit other cars–but in fact, the citywide collision rate has been trending downward. It’s pedestrians who are getting hit more often than before.

Image from SDOT's 2010 Traffic Report

The top three reasons for collisions seem indicative of a larger “my hurry is more important than your hurry” mindset: they were “not granting the right of way to a vehicle, inattention and following too closely.” Speeding, especially on arterials, can be a huge problem. SDOT found that a full 25 percent of SW Admiral Way traffic fell into the aggressive speeder category, exceeding the posted limit (30 mph) by ten miles per hour or more.

At Crosscut, senior citizen Doug McDonald notes that “Sixty percent of the dead pedestrians were senior citizens,” while in a majority of the pedestrian-hit-by-car incidents where responsibility could be assigned, the driver was at fault. (This is not to ignore the number of collisions caused by pedestrians strolling obliviously into the street, but the person they’re doing in is themselves.) In 2010, you were most likely to be killed by a car walking between 9 and 10 a.m., 1 and 3 p.m., and 6 to 7 p.m.

Interestingly, though you’d never know it from the complaints about from people driving cars about how terrible traffic is, Seattle’s average daily traffic the past two years is the lowest it’s been since 2000. And not by a negligible amount, either. 2003’s high of almost 980,000 daily vehicle trips fell to 900,000 in 2009, bouncing back slightly to 910,000 last year.

It’s not clear how much a 20-mph speed limit on certain residential streets would affect accident rates. There is always the question of whether people would obey the limit in the first place. But it doesn’t seem like a terrible thing, does it, if people want to request a lower speed limit where they live?